Some interesting points and patterns were identified in this book, but overall there was no major "aha!" moment for me. This pales in comparison to the research and critical points raised in Prisms of the People, which I feel is a much stronger book on all accounts (though perhaps more academic and a bit denser).
Pluses:
- They lay out clear patterns that distinguished the successful movements they looked at. Some of these patterns were a bit redundant (grassroots investment and "be leaderfull"), and some were a bit flimsy (the power of businesses in movements), but they made a clear case for each.
- Their definition of "movement" is very broad, which allowed them to include some nontraditional examples I was less familiar with, such as the global cause to eradicate polio and Mothers Against Drunk Driving.
- This book is easy to read, easy to follow.
On the other hand:
- I dislike their vague, broad determination of what qualifies as a "movement." In fact, they don't even DEFINE movement, they just say they take a "systems approach" when determining what qualifies as a movement (by looking at all of the inter-related pieces that come together to achieve something.) But by this definition a political campaign could be a movement, a fad could be a movement! My frustration with this lack of definition definitely colored my opinion of this book from the start, to be honest.
- Their choice of the "environmental" example was the cap and trade agreement that addressed the acid rain problem in the late 80s/early 90s. I don't know any environmentalists (except maybe EDF) who would call this a "movement." This was a successful campaign! It was not transformative (as I'd define movements to be), it was transactional. It also flies in the face of one of the main factors of movements in that those most impacted weren't at the forefront--environmental justice communities almost universally HATE cap and trade, because it's permission to pollute in the poorest and least represented areas.
- Relatedly, the cap and trade example touted the involvement of businesses and a "market-based" solution to this problem. I'm not sure that I believe a market-based solution can ever be transformative, as it's inherently based on the system (capitalism) that is at the root of so many of society's problems today.
- It seemed like a weakness of this book to me that despite the emphasis on the "grassroots" and a networked leadership approach, there was no analysis of what "grassroots power" looked like, no deep dive into how organizations invested in their grassroots (beyond the topline of how much money was spent, and a bit on how MADD set-up their chapters), and the only people interviewed for these case studies were the top leaders at huge organizations or coalitions.
This provided a lot of food for thought for me as I explore my and my organization's role in movement-building. But I can't say it offered much that I hadn't already been thinking about.