We got this story at a sale at the library, and listened to it on CD on a long drive.
I thoroughly enjoyed it (4 stars), including the concept of a forensic psychologist, trying to determine after-the-fact whether someone was suicidal or whether the death was from a different cause. But I don't usually reread mysteries once I know whodunit. (5 stars.)
One of the other reviewers said that she loved the book because she's bipolar and thought it was an accurate description of bipolar disease.
The story kept me on the edge of my seat, and I may have even listened to it in the car for a few moments even when I didn't have to go anywhere.
Some of the other reviewers felt some of the action wasn't realistic, but that didn't detract from the story for me. I have to agree, though. Just how long were those cables? And while, yes, long cables do exist, why were there such long cables just happening to be there? It's okay. That didn't detract from the story to me.
Some people complained that there were too many plot twists in this story. I liked them. It's part of what made it exciting.
I liked that Jo thought through things, including all the evidence, as well as what they implied. I liked that approach. However, her sister pointed out that her analytical side didn't extend into her personal life, which was a point that she conceded was well taken, and well worth thinking through.
That whole scene with the garbage can seemed to be unprofessional of Jo. I almost can't imagine a professional acting like that.
But the scene out the window showed there were multiple sides to Jo than just the analytical professional.
One thing I learned from this story was that those with paranoia often project their own negative feelings onto others, because they feel uncomfortable dealing with them in their own skin. I had never heard of that before, and I looked it up to verify.
It actually makes a lot of sense to me, and can explain something in someone I know, who frequently presupposes that others have negative feelings towards her, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary. It makes me wonder if she has mild paranoia, and that she's uncomfortable dealing with negative emotions of her own. I don't mean the traveling-across-multiple-states to escape people who aren't chasing you type of paranoia. I've known someone else like that, too. It makes me think that like other things, there can be mild cases, which, for the most part, go unrecognized.
Some reviewers complained that some "clues" were too easy, and while yes, that was true, those tended to be the clues that didn't matter for the deeper layers of what was going on. I did not find the over-all mystery easy to solve, although, yes, there were clues there, too. Just not easy ones.
My nitpick is that as the highest ranking medical professional (a medical dr who has been to medical school) on the scene of some of these emergency situations, she would not have been allowed to turn over a patient to a lesser ranking medical professional. She could not just leave like that. There is a strict protocol for that. Of course, she didn't announce that she was a dr either, but that gets into a fuzzy ethical dilemma.