Which Bible?

by David O. Fuller

Book by

Genres: Theology, Nonfiction

318 pages, Paperback

First published June 1, 1975

Reviews

[Read1000books · Rating 4 out of 5]

The King James Version is the most trust-worthy translation of the Bible. This book (the first of a trilogy, all edited by David O. Fuller) and the next two in the trilogy, will explain why.

[Aaron Irlbacher · Rating 1 out of 5]

This book aims to persuade the reader to believe the King James Bible, based upon ancient Greek manuscripts, is the pure Word of God juxtaposition all modern English translations after the King James translation. The most glaring problem, in my opinion, is the premise of this entire book is grounded in historical fiction. For example, According to this book, Justin Martyr is a heretic. How does the author substantiate such an outrageous claim? He doesn’t. He merely tells a historically fictional account of the early church after the death of the apostle John and continues to Propogate more false details through church history until the arrival of the reformation, where the church had passed down the pure Greek text from generation to generation from the apostles. Fuller propagates an ignorantly false narrative that could not have come from a serious reading of the early church fathers to the reformers.

Is the false historical narrative the only problem of misinformation in this book? No. Is all the content in this book inaccurate? No. This is just another polemical book to discourage English readers from using translations that are not King James Bibles. Will this book convince people either way? Likely not. The arguments are far too weak to persuade people interested in searching out the claims of Fuller’s work. Yet, the ideas will undoubtedly strengthen the belief of the KJV only stance if the reader has already decided upon this position.

[Robert Drumheller · Rating 5 out of 5]

Excellent book on where our Bible translations originated

[Douglas Wilson · Rating 3 out of 5]

Good.