A nice 5 star read with an average rating of: 9.25/10
My rating system:
1 star: 1.0-2.9/10
2 stars: 3.0-5.4/10
3 stars: 5.5-7.0/10
4 stars: 7.1-9.0/10
5 stars: 9.1-10/10
I’ll give my opinions based on plot, characters, and writing. Weighing the writing twice, because it is such a big part in my experience of the book.
Plot:
8/10
Mr. Locke opens up a new lock store in town called Locke and Keye. We know nothing about him or his past, only that he is looking for new personnel. The book starts off with a short summary of the first month the store is open by giving us Mr. Locke’s opinions of all the applicants and we see he has a thing with lonely people. The ones without a family. Then we get an introduction to each point of view and our dive into Mr. Locke’s plan starts. He is trying to build a cult-like ‘family’ with his four employees and apprentice. Meanwhile murders start happening, and not of your regular random person, but of men who violently mistreat their women. We might or might not know who did this, as well as the why, but this isn’t the focus of the plot. Although it felt at least a little bit inspired by Jack the Ripper stories.
There isn’t a lot more to the plot, but that’s also not needed as this is a character driven book with the minimal amount of plot needed to make the book not only be driven forward by the character dynamics. Nonetheless it was really well done and everything was very beautifully intertwined and tied up in the end.
Characters:
10/10
Like I wrote before, we have got a multi-perspective novel here. This can go two ways: extremely well with every character adding to the overall plot or dynamic, or very badly with a lot of redundant scenes. In this case it was definitely the former. Everything added another layer and perspective. Every character brought in very well thought out experiences.
In this book we have six perspectives in total: Mr. Locke, Jude, Matthew, Timothy, John, and Luke. With different personalities, and, for the careful onlooker, the name of a biblical apostle (or a reference to it).
Now let me dive into each of these characters a bit.
Mr. Locke
I’ll leave this one alone, you know what you need to know. This character is mysterious in everything. You don’t know a thing about his past, his motives, or his way of thinking except for the things you get at the beginning and the few lines he gets in the other character’s perspectives. Telling more would spoil the mystery of what is actually going on. Which would be a shame to do.
Jude
Mr. Locke’s favorite, but we don’t know why until the end. Jude is a very violent man who can’t stand mistreatment. He also suffers from what seems like PTSD. This, in turn, leads him into dissociative psychoses. It was done so well it felt real. The loosing of control and having no idea where you are or what you did. And if you remember, it’s a complete misrepresentation of what truly happened. It was so painfully accurate and the reason why was so sad and painful. But it does explain his tendency to follow Mr. Locke, who at least seems to know what he doing and what purpose he has. The outcome of this could only be predicted by John.
John
A very kindhearted, patient man who mentors Timothy in becoming a locksmith and also in how to think critically and ask the right questions. He is most suspicious of what is happening around him and seems the only who doesn’t trust it from the beginning. His decisions are weighed and seem to always be what the situation asks for. Through his kindness and patience he tries to help everyone who directly and indirectly asks for it.
Timothy
The orphan apprentice in to lock shop. He is only fourteen years old and very shy. He also doubts what he should say and when and how throughout most of the book as well as doubting the situation they’re in. By John’s mentoring he learns to be more critical and to understand social behavior more. Critical thinking, the thing might be worth having so you don’t need to follow others all the time.
Because of this he starts to feel more and more comfortable asking questions about how things normally work. He also becomes more comfortable in identifying his own discomfort in situations. But does this help him in any way?
Matthew and Luke
I would mention these two separately, but pretty early on in the book they form a deep connection when Luke helps Matthew out. They tell one another what happened and why they still hurt and their joined development starts there. With the very insecure and mentally small. He grows and understands more of his wants and needs with Luke’s help. He also can finally express and accept his pains from the past. This is also where Matthew helps Luke. He seems to become caring again, where all his capacity for giving and wanting to feel any kind of love seemed to have been shut off. At the end I couldn’t help eye-rolling at Matthew’s decision still, even though it totally was in character and somehow understandable from his perspective. I just didn’t get it.
All in all I loved the development of the characters and the way they didn’t seem to change for convenience (sometimes happens on accident when not intended). I also loved the way we just got enough of Mr. Locke (including not knowing his first name until the ending) to become curious about him and somewhat annoyed about not knowing his intentions without getting annoyed with the book for now showing me anything.
Writing
9.5/10
First out with the negatives (which aren’t really there, except for some small things). I have just two. Near the end the word merciless is used and I have nothing against the word choice, but it seemed like it was an adjective and should’ve said: mercilessly.
The other one is: blood doesn’t smell. You know what scene I’m talking about when you’ve read the book. The room smelling of blood is only mentioned once. But fresh blood doesn’t smell and neither does older blood that hasn’t yet clotted (fully). Clotted blood also doesn’t have a smell. This misconception needs to go. Looking and smelling gruesome/disgusting isn’t the same.
Now on the actual writing of the book: wow. One of the few I’ve read in my life I was fully immersed in all the time. Even in the train and outside. From the moment I picked it up until I had to put it down. I wanted to keep on reading because the buildup suspense just made me wonder what Locke’s intentions were and what it would lead to next. It’s all down to setting and choice of words creating an almost perfect, if not perfect setting and atmosphere for this story to happen.
The way the theme of family, created or otherwise was entwined in the book from a lot of different dimensions was also something I loved lot. It showed beautifully how the right dynamics and stimulations by your family members can make you grow as a person and make you stronger. It also shows how sometimes the smallest of actions can destroy the psyche of a child and create such thought patterns, convictions, and behaviors that it will never be properly resolved. Not even with the support of a family will the mark be fully gone.
The beauty and destruction people can cause one another (also a theme in Anatomy of a Darkened Heart). And the grim truths it create when not dealt with properly.
It also worked in beautifully described feelings of (in)security, doubt, kindness, love, anger, and utter hate. As well as the way injustice for domestically abused women is brought up in here.
I loved the names of the character too. All employees had the name of an apostle of Jesus, the name that fit that person’s personality traits best. It was done so well that the names can be used to hint yourself of roles later played by these characters. Timothy’s (the apprentice) name seems to a reference to the apostle Thomas. The character traits fit well with that as well.
Of course the secretive Mr. Locke’s name refers to him keeping most, if not all, of himself to himself. We don’t even know his first name until the ending. That first name adds an extra layer to the character as well. We can see its meaning in how he acts a lot of the time.
Finally: the writing flows well and is easy to read, even though the themes are dark and rough. One big YES to me.