As someone who is just embarking on their career in acedemia, I found the personal struggles these woman have overcome both terrifying and comforting. Reading a first hand account of how someone went through the process of not making tenure made the possibility a reality. However, it also made clear that life goes on, not without some bouts with bitterness and self-doubt, but it goes on. It also demonstrates strategies to deal with issues common to scientists such as rejection, even if it occurs on a smaller scale like the rejection of a paper or a grant. I was initial turned off by the terms they use from Radical psychiatry, like pig for a "negative self impression" or strokes for compliments for another group member. But I would encourage other readers to push through this initial reaction as I came to see that part of the reason their group worked was that it had a foundation and that there were rules in how they interacted in these meetings. I think it also helped them to externalize the feelings by attaching a name to it. I found reading about people who have struggled with issues that logic tells us everyone must deals with, but feel like very personal battles, very refreshing in a career path that tends to encourage stoicism.