I loved this book beyond measure, and I am considering writing my first letter to a living author to thank them for their contribution to my life. This is a scholarly work, but far from inaccessible to the lay person. I have added a shelf to accommodate it-art history, in which I am far better read than my Goodreads shelves might indicate. With that acknowledged, this book explores the intersection of alchemy and art, and makes a strong case for exploring the history of science from a more inclusive view. Traditionally the history of science has been heroic in its narrative, concentrating on those who have contributed to paradigm shifts, like Newton and Copernicus. Smith explores a different perspective, literally. Art history is usually an Italy-centric approach, with much weight given to the development of perspective. She repeats an interesting take on that-that concepts of space as described by mathematics changed the way people comprehended space, but instead focuses on the hyper-realism of the Northern European artists whose concern was the exploration of light. Previous to reading this I had not contextualized Albrecht Durer in history as in the same cultural shift as Paracelsus, but Smith makes the connection clear in that they both studied nature first hand with religious motivations. Nor did I know that the making of vermillion pigment so closely parallels the processes described in alchemical materials as the manufacture of the philosophers stone. The book is too rich for quick digestion in this brief review, and indeed my head is still whirling with a new understanding-the mark of a truly successful reframe in comprehension. One more note on the title-the book demonstrates the connection between embodied learning, the understanding gained through experience and the creation of identity as an individual, a central theme in the Renaissance.