Hmm. I really wanted to like this book - I hunted it down on archive.org after it was mentioned in Ilse Crawford's episode of "Abstract" on Netflix (an absolutely inspirational series - highly recommended if you have even a passing interest in design). Overall, I like her premise - that our homes should be pleasing to all our senses - but this book feels under-researched and definitely under-edited and overall just a bit woolly in its writing.
Some specific issues:
I felt that there was little acknowledgement of people's differing economic situations - for example, she mentions linen sheets several times and waxes lyrical about silk sheets - but cotton sheets are also excellent and vastly more affordable and easier to find than either linen or silk. And then there was the moment where she suggested I "spend more than you can afford" on a special piece of furniture I will love forever. Cos debt's always the right answer to your interior design quandries. Yeeeeeeessss. Um. No.
I felt that much of what she said in the food section felt a bit judgmental in her use of language in places, and sometimes a bit condescending. Phrases like "We judge freshness by the label, and barely touch food as we whisk it into the oven or microwave" feel like she has employed them to try to form a clunky bond with her (presumably completely ignorant of the joys of fresh food) reader. But this feels a misfire to me - if she's as gung-ho on fresh food as she says she is, then she isn't "judging freshness by the label" so it reads as a falsity.
I feel that she hasn't really identified who she's writing for - do the people who can afford linen or silk sheets live entirely off ready-meals? I suspect they don't. And this is a problem not only of writing but more significantly of editing, which should have picked up these anomalies (not to mention the ghastly overspending comment) and helped her to rework them.
Her editor also should have done some fact-checking. Crawford includes a story about John Cage's piece 4'33" - "The piece began with Cage raising the lid of the piano" - except that that piece was first performed by David Tudor and I believe (but do correct me if I'm wrong) was never performed by Cage himself in public. This may seem a small point (and, yes, perhaps disturbingly niche), but it set the stage for my reading of Crawford's text so that with every claim she made about things in my house making me ill, or women having a more acute sense of smell or whatever, had me pining for a nice reference as to where she'd found this morsel of information. When combined with the cavalier writing and unclear audience direction, I found myself craving some reassurance that what I had in front of me was not actually just a first draft of half-remembered snippets of this and that but maybe had some substance to it. I have rarely felt so adrift in a text as to feel that I could not trust the information I was given.
(Reading back what I've just written it might be worth noting that I am currently in the middle of writing my thesis and reading books on academic writing, so my impression is quite possibly coloured by that context, but I do feel that the comment about needing a jolly good edit still stands, and things stated in books as facts should be actual facts otherwise both author and publisher look like sloppy idiots.)
Ah well. Now that all the criticism is out of the way, there are some nice bits about this book (I did, after all, give it 2 stars not 1). Some lovely photography of interesting interiors (as you'd expect), and as I said at the start, I like her premise. There's some nice ideas here and there, and a whole section of 'Database' at the back of the book with more precise and practical information about things like aromatherapy, recipes for natural cleaning products, improving air quality, houseplants and what types of toxins certain plants are best at removing from the air. This part felt a lot more useful that the woolly text which appears in most of the book. Also, it's quite a short read! I skipped a couple of sections (bathing because I don't have a bath and a couple of spreads which were black text on a dark red background I wasn't going to do that to my eyes) but basically read the whole thing in a little over 2 hours.
I'm planning on having a look at her book 'A frame for life' too (also available on archive.org to borrow by the hour for free), so while I'm hoping for better editing on that one, clearly I've not been completely put off...