What do you think?
Rate this book


199 pages, Kindle Edition
Published July 10, 2018
There is an occult concept of the “egregore,” a term derived from the Greek word for “watcher.” It is used for an immaterial entity that “watches” or presides over some earthly affair or collectivity. The important point is that an egregore is augmented by human belief, ritual, and especially by sacrifice. If it is sufficiently nourished by such energies, the egregore can take on a life of its own and appear to be an independent, personal divinity, with a limited power on behalf of its devotees and an unlimited appetite for further devotion. It is then believed to be an immortal god or goddess, an angel, or a daimon.
The majority of the [initiates] are not aware of the dual origin of the deities. . . . They do not comprehend that the latter are born of the mental concentration of the masses of believers and again, temporarily created by the thought of the officiating monk who acts as a magnet attracting these already existing occult forces or personalities. [emphasis added]
Analogy . . . is a hermeneutical device that opens up a way to an understanding of the many horizon forms of lived experience by making the beholder ponder and establish new connections. That is why symbol and analogy are inextricably interwoven; what is conceived as an analogy on one level or in one direction, becomes a symbol on another level and in another direction. Both play a vital role in quickening, vitalizing, and vivifying the individuation process. Today we witness the destruction of symbols and analogies by an unprecedented reification of them, in the wake of which we ourselves become reduced to manipulatable things that have no individuality of their own. Stories of individuation . . . may come as a timely reminder of looking deeper and farther ahead into the being-ness of our Being.
As a general rule, the thought-form is built around some person or group of persons, and as the numbers admitted increase, so the power and range of the Egregore increases, and a peculiar reciprocal action takes place. Each member of the group pours energy into the collective thought-form but, equally, into each member there also passes the influence of the group as a whole. This reverse action brings to light certain problems. It is increasingly apparent to those outside the group that any member of it is being influenced to some degree by the pressure of the collective thinking of all linked with it, and unless care is taken, the power of independent thought may be reduced. For many people this is something they actually seek, they may feel inadequate in the everyday world and feel that by being linked in this way, they are protected from what they see as aggressive tendencies from other people. Or again, they may feel inadequate to deal with new ideas and situations and feel that the Group mind will do their thinking for them, and they will not be in danger of wrong thinking. [emphasis added]