This review doesn’t really contain spoilers: I allude to a spoiler, which, unless you’re a bit dense, you see coming a mile away and can even guess from the Goodreads book description. But I’ve flagged it as a spoiler review anyway.
Foreign Bodies was recommended to me as Singaporean literary fiction (set in and written by an author from Singapore), ahead of my visit there.
As a novel of Singapore, it benefits from seeing through the eyes of someone somewhat on the sidelines (football pun intended – far too much of this book bored me about football). Hwee Hwee Tan grew up in Singapore, lived in the Netherlands, studied in England and then lived in New York. The novel’s view of Singapore is deeply informed but far from laudatory. The critical distance with which the novel gazes on Singapore is increased by the fact large sections are from the perspective of an English twenty-something male. (The depiction of a nowhere town in England in the 1990s is so expertly captured, I was unsurprised to discover the author lived in England for a time).
Chapters are told from the perspectives of three main characters: Mei, the Singaporean girlfriend of Andy, who is also implausibly his lawyer; Andy, an “ang mo” (a problematic Hokkien term for a white foreigner, literally meaning “red-haired”, which Andy is too), who appears to have been framed for a serious gambling offence (the football), by a person unknown; and Eugene, a friend of both and who… you can guess. And that’s a fundamental problem with this novel. What else is Eugene doing as one of the narrators in this book if not the obvious?
Another problem is the chapters are divided very much unevenly. Although we start and end with Mei, there are many chapters in a row headed “Andy”, such that this is as much, if not more, his story than hers. Only a few chapters are Eugene’s.
Hwee Hwee Tan has said (in an interview at the back of my WSP copy of the book) that she was pleased the critics did not call her characters flat. I’d grant her that, too. Mei and Andy were utterly convincing, as were their surroundings; even Eugene, though underused, was not underdeveloped.
Thematically, besides justice, accountability, retribution, the inequitable treatment of women and foreigners within the Singaporean social and legal systems, and exploring class-based prejudices, this novel also deals with child sexual abuse. It does so powerfully, and so it feels particularly harsh to say this: the theme feels out of place, as though two novels (or three – see below) were being written at once. The connection between Mei’s and Andy’s struggles is the injustice both experience, but the reason Andy faces injustice and the reason the sexual abuse goes unpunished are utterly divergent – unless one were to blame Mei’s silence for both injustices, which one could, but which surely was not the point Hwee Hwee Tan was trying to make.
There are extraordinarily strong passages of prose concerning the emptiness of modern life, but those all culminate in one message: “Jesus saves”. Jesus, God and – in later pages, perhaps retrospectively trying to bolster a theme – Job, take up strange positions in the novel. Mei and Andy both expound upon Christian teachings and beliefs while seemingly failing to live out their principles. At one point Mei swears an oath on the Bible which stops her acting in her client’s best interests and thereby perpetuates injustice; seemingly she failed to read the part of the Bible which says, “But I tell you, do not swear an oath at all” (Matthew 5:34), still less “Do not pervert justice” (Leviticus 19:15). Faith seems central to and, simultaneously, tagged-on to the characters’ – and dare I say the author’s – thinking.
Too much was competing in this novel for it to hang together well. The Eugene sections could have been cut, and we could have seen Mei’s and Andy’s interactions with him from their perspectives instead, which would have hugely increased the suspense in the novel, helped with pacing and removed the Netherlands sections (which seemed to be included to show the author can vividly depict not one, not two, but three settings).
This is a religious morality tale – oddly more along Old Testament lines than New – which is barely concealed within a poorly crafted whodunnit, albeit one that is at points beautifully written and extraordinary well observed.