When you read Seneca, a great moralist and supreme representative of Stoicism, you seem to be reading Jesus Christ or the Buddha. His moral teachings, his lack of interest in material things, the superiority of morally superior man are some of his main teachings.
Thank you Di Corletts for having recommended this book: "On the shortness of life, on the happy life and other essays". In fact, many of the teachings resemble Buddhism.
However, when I read something of Seneca's life, I saw that he was not as holy as he himself was proclaimed, so superior or so elevated. Is it because he had to be an advisor to the Roman emperor Nero, perhaps one of the worst emperors?