•Read for University•
•••
I wish this book wouldn’t have been the first book that I finish reading this year but I needed to read it for University. To tell the truth, I needed to read “Daughters of the vicar” already last year but am very behind in all my reading for this specific course. My exam is in a few weeks so time to grind all the missed reading in the next couple of days.
•••
Now onto the review.
There is not really anything I can say about this book.
Would I have read this book if it wasn’t a requirement for one of my courses? No, never.
Even though the book in itself is very short, the pace of the book, for me anyway, dragged on and on. There wasn’t anything very noticeable, very acknowledgeable in this story and left me very disappointed when finishing the book. I finished it in 2 hours, yet honestly felt like the longest 2 hours of my life.
One thing I would like to talk about is D.H. Lawrence writing style. I did quiet enjoy how mundane, or for a lack of a better word, easy his choice of words were. What I have problems usually with older works is, I can’t quiet always catch the essence of a work, solely by the fact that I don’t understand the choice of words or the historical context the book is from. “Daughters of the vicar”, however, uses very mundane language, that we, today, still use, and that has made the understanding of the book easier for me.
•••
Would I recommend “Daughters of the vicar”?
Honestly, it’s up to your preference. I rarely read classics and/or older books, so for me I wouldn’t recommend it.
But if you do like classics and/or older books, or have read a few books from D.H. Lawrence before, and have liked his writing style, or are just looking for a quick read, then I would recommend this book.
•••