What do you think?
Rate this book
Complexity: Design Strategy and World View
Digitalization has transformed the discourse of that discourse is now defined by a wealth of new terms and concepts that previously either had no meaning, or had different meanings, in the context of architectural theory and design. Its concepts and strategies are increasingly shaped by influences emerging at the intersection with scientific and cultural notions from modern information technology. The series Context Architecture seeks to take a critical selection of concepts that play a vital role in the current discourse and put them up for discussion. When Vitruvius described the architect as a "uomo universale," he gave rise to the architect’s conception of him- or herself as a generalist who shapes a complex reality. The architectural concept of complexity, however, failed to keep pace with industrial and social reality, becoming instead an increasingly formal and superficial notion that could ultimately be applied to almost anything. Against it, architectural modernism set the watchword of "less is more." In this situation, Robert Venturi reintroduced the notion of complexity into architectural his goal was not just to restore the complexity of architectonic forms and their history but also to explore the concrete reality of the existing built environment. Today it is complexity studies, with their starting point in physics, that define the current approach to the concept of complexity. They have established a new connection between the natural sciences and information technology and have thus become a central premise of computer-based approaches to design.
128 pages, Hardcover
First published June 19, 2004
20 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
May 25, 2016
This booklet is collection of eight essays on the notion of complexity, considered from an architectural and scientific perspective. Obviously, the roughly 100 pages are hardly enough to do the subject justice.
There are two short contributions from two protagonists in the debate around architectural complexity: Robert Venturi shares some notes on and excerpts from the thesis he wrote at Princeton in 1950 and which provided the basis for his "Contradiction and Complexity in Architecture" more than fifteen years later. In that book, Venturi relies on Gestalt-psychological principles to introduce a notion of complexity that emerges from the interplay between building and context. In her short essay for this volume Denise Scott Brown argues that context in itself needs to be put in context of the operative cultural, social and economic setting: "the architect who cares not at all for context is a boor; the one who care only for context is a bore".
Andrea Gleininger discusses how post-war reactions to modernist architecture remained all mired in abstraction. Venturi wrestled a notion that was firmly entrenched in the fields of cybernetics and information technology "to restore to both art and everyday life the rights they had been deprived of by the strategies of simplifying systematization that governed the abstract model of architectural design prevailing in Modernism."
Georg Vrachliotis usefully retraces three lines of development underlying the concept of complexity in architecture: a Gestalt-psychological line, a cybernetic and a biological-algorithmic line. These progressively come closer to an operationalisation of the complex by means of sophisticated software tools. Kostas Terzidis builds on this by pointing out how cellular automata and genetic algorithms provide designers with novel, open-ended heuristic strategies, disclosing solution spaces that designers didn't even know existed.
Mainzer's rather unimaginative treatment of the core ideas underlying complexity science is dispensable. Rather awkwardly his discussion links into once trendy notions such as Web 2.0 and virtual reality. Johann Feichter's discusses how predictive models allow us to come to grips with the extraordinary complexity of nested feedback loops in the climate system.
The volume closes with a short contribution from philosopher Clemens Bellut who interestingly points out how modernity has an ambiguous relationship with complexity: on the one hand it laments the unknowability that comes with it and on the other hand it fetishizes complexity as a token of its proper sophistication.
Most essays are translated from German and at times it shows. Notably, Andrea Gleiniger's rather academic prose has not been able to free itself fully from its rather lumbering cadence. Disturbing (or amusing) idiosyncracies are scattered throughout the text ("symbolic"? "viable insights"?).
All in all a neat little book but not indispensable.
There are two short contributions from two protagonists in the debate around architectural complexity: Robert Venturi shares some notes on and excerpts from the thesis he wrote at Princeton in 1950 and which provided the basis for his "Contradiction and Complexity in Architecture" more than fifteen years later. In that book, Venturi relies on Gestalt-psychological principles to introduce a notion of complexity that emerges from the interplay between building and context. In her short essay for this volume Denise Scott Brown argues that context in itself needs to be put in context of the operative cultural, social and economic setting: "the architect who cares not at all for context is a boor; the one who care only for context is a bore".
Andrea Gleininger discusses how post-war reactions to modernist architecture remained all mired in abstraction. Venturi wrestled a notion that was firmly entrenched in the fields of cybernetics and information technology "to restore to both art and everyday life the rights they had been deprived of by the strategies of simplifying systematization that governed the abstract model of architectural design prevailing in Modernism."
Georg Vrachliotis usefully retraces three lines of development underlying the concept of complexity in architecture: a Gestalt-psychological line, a cybernetic and a biological-algorithmic line. These progressively come closer to an operationalisation of the complex by means of sophisticated software tools. Kostas Terzidis builds on this by pointing out how cellular automata and genetic algorithms provide designers with novel, open-ended heuristic strategies, disclosing solution spaces that designers didn't even know existed.
Mainzer's rather unimaginative treatment of the core ideas underlying complexity science is dispensable. Rather awkwardly his discussion links into once trendy notions such as Web 2.0 and virtual reality. Johann Feichter's discusses how predictive models allow us to come to grips with the extraordinary complexity of nested feedback loops in the climate system.
The volume closes with a short contribution from philosopher Clemens Bellut who interestingly points out how modernity has an ambiguous relationship with complexity: on the one hand it laments the unknowability that comes with it and on the other hand it fetishizes complexity as a token of its proper sophistication.
Most essays are translated from German and at times it shows. Notably, Andrea Gleiniger's rather academic prose has not been able to free itself fully from its rather lumbering cadence. Disturbing (or amusing) idiosyncracies are scattered throughout the text ("symbolic"? "viable insights"?).
All in all a neat little book but not indispensable.
Displaying 1 of 1 review