This book was recommended to me by a colleague (a Reformed Christian), but I quickly realized that I was probably not the right audience. Written in the late 1980s, The Man in the Mirror has aged like fine milk: its advice feels outdated, simplistic, and, at times, downright preachy.
The book’s core issue is its "pray and obey" approach to personal struggles. No matter the problem, the solution is always the same: pray more, trust God, and remember that He is watching you. While faith can be an important aspect of self-improvement, the book lacks philosophical depth, psychological nuance, or practical guidance. It relies heavily on religious slogans rather than genuine self-examination or intellectual engagement.
Another major flaw is its constant repetition: the same few ideas are stretched over hundreds of pages, making it feel preachy rather than insightful. The tone is also deeply rooted in American evangelical Protestantism, which may feel alien or overly dogmatic to those from different religious or cultural backgrounds. As an Italian Catholic with a rational mindset, I found its approach too simplistic and lacking the intellectual rigor of proper theological, philosophical, or self-help works.
A particularly frustrating aspect is its tendency to take the Bible ad litteram, without considering its historical and literary context. The Old Testament, in particular, is full of metaphors, allegories, and moral similitudes, and even Jesus himself spoke in parables to illustrate deeper truths. Interpreting all of it literally often results in naïve (or lazily convenient) misinterpretations rather than meaningful moral reflections.
That being said, The Man in the Mirror is not completely without merit. One thing I appreciated is how it helped me reflect on the moral teachings of the Bible and how they can still apply in today's world. Some passages provided a thought-provoking lens on issues like integrity, materialism, and purpose.
Additionally, despite its overtly religious framework, I noticed some interesting parallelisms with other philosophical traditions, such as Stoicism, Cynicism, and even Buddhism. The themes of self-discipline, detachment from material possessions, and personal accountability resonate with those schools of thought, even if the book doesn’t explicitly make these connections. But, alas, those are peculiar of Christianity as a whole, and not specifically of this text.
If you’re looking for a solid exploration of personal growth and faith, this book will likely disappoint. It oversimplifies life’s struggles into "just trust God," takes the Bible too literally, and feels repetitive and moralistic rather than truly insightful. However, if you’re interested in a light devotional read that offers some basic moral reflections, it might still have some value. Even though I do emphasize again it is a tad outdated, despite what the author claims in the latest revised edition.
Personally, I would recommend books that approach these topics with more depth, philosophy, and rational analysis rather than relying on blind faith and obedience. Contrarily to many Reformed beliefs, modern Catholicism is solidly founded on such concepts. Think inter alia of Augustine of Hippo, Thomas More, Thomas Aquinas, Edith Stein, or Francis of Assisi.
Two stars, because I am feeling generous: one for the (at times) useful biblical reflections, and another for the occasional philosophical concepts.