Theological Methods, offers a comprehensive collection of models of theological reflection. By bringing this diverse collection together in one place, the editors create a unique reference work that allows a clear and visible contrast and comparison as each model is treated formally and in a standard format. Throughout each chapter the distinguishing features of the model are examined, the geneology and origins are discussed, worked examples of the model applied to contemporary theology are provided, and critical commentary, future trends and exercises and questions are provided. Now firmly established as an essential text on theological reflection, this new edition has been revised and updated with a new introduction, updated examples, and refreshed bibliographies
Elaine Graham is Grosvenor Research Professor of Practical Theology at the University of Chester, a position she has held since 2009. As a practical theologian, she is interested in the relationship between beliefs and actions, and whether religious commitment really makes a difference in today’s world. In her teaching and research, she stives to encourage people to connect the values of faith to a critical engagement with the dilemmas of everyday life.
I really did not find this book to be particularly useful or interesting. In fact I find the theological reflection techniques suggested in this book to be outside wise exegetical standards. Theological reflection is a useful practice, but these approaches I didn't find helpful.
As an introduction to theological reflection, it certainly does its job. If the goal in reading is to understand how to do theological reflection, how to broaden one's horizons, or how to understand how others may reflect theologically, one could certainly do worse than starting here. The various forms of theological reflection are both explained and exhibited.
However, I am a little disappointed in two key ways. First, when showing examples of the method's use throughout history, there is a progression from "old," to "modern," to then "method realized." Apparently, the most contemporary versions of each method are the culmination and realization of the method. That's troubling. Even if we are to say that those who reflect theologically with a particular method are doing so more knowingly than those in the past have, we are still suggesting that prior to our present era religious were incapable of fully reflecting theologically and spiritually. It is possible to argue that our theology today is closer to God's truth, at least within each method, but the notion that we can trust ourselves and today's theologians more than anyone else throughout history is a bit silly.
Secondly, there isn't much in the way of invitation. Yes, the process of theological reflection and each method are explained well, but if the point of theological reflection is to do it rather than understand it, then we're out of luck here. A single chapter at the end to invite practical exploration, or a single paragraph at the end of each chapter, would have been enough.
Overall, this is a good book. Very usable. Broadens the perspective of what "theology" entails, highlighting the reflective, communal, and practical/active aspects of theological reflection. Would be a great compliment to an introduction to theology class.