Being a Secret Service agent is one of the most treacherous jobs in the world and never more so than in today's highly polarized America. Facing threats from fence jumpers and manifesto writers, and from fanatical terrorists and sophisticated spies, protecting the president is harder than ever. In an age of hyper-partisan politics, emotions are high and crazies are a dime a dozen. On top of that, with international tensions reaching a boiling point, it's harder than ever to determine friend from foe.
Yet the President of the United States is in very real danger if the Secret Service doesn't change course soon and evolve with the rapidly changing threat environment. Highly motivated "bad guys" are already working on technologically advanced methodologies and are constantly striving to formulate the logistics of an attack on the White House. Eventually terrorist planners will find a way to acquire the technology, weapons, explosives, and know-how to make an attempt on the life of the President. The only question is "What are we going to do about it?"
Protecting the President provides not only a rare insider glimpse of what the Secret Service does, but explores the challenges facing the agents today. Chock-full of relevant stories of protecting past presidents, veteran agent Dan Bongino explains how the agency can best protect the president today. This book covers how the Secret Service should
plan for a tactical assault by a terrorist attack team prepare to respond to a severe medical emergency train to handle a chemical or biological weapon attack prepare for an attack using explosives, and plan for 9-11 style attacks from the air and fire threats and much more
Daniel John Bongino is a conservative commentator and former Secret Service agent. Bongino is a member of the Republican Party. He is the host of the popular conservative podcast, The Dan Bongino Show.
This book is all about being a secret service agent and what he witnessed. Obviously he is Republican but it did not seem like a hatchet job. He discusses his failed run for the Senate and limitations placed on him because of his role.
Bongino is more of a Republican Libertarian, where I am more libertarian libertarian. He does make some interesting points. He calls out Clinton on her email scandal and rightfully so.
I get that a lot of people hate Trump but what blows my mind is that EVERYTHING they accuse Trump of doing that he should be impeached on is exactly and princely was Hillary did. Collusion, Obstruction, dealing with a foreign power to change the outcome of an election, use of power and privilege to grant favors for counties in return for "donations" to the Clinton Foundation and on top of all of that, the email scandal. I am not even talking about White Water, travel gate, attacking women her husband was accused of full on raping. Yet to Democrats, they literally cried when the piece of crap lost to Trump. So it would have been perfectly acceptable for Hillary to do everything Trump was falsely accused of.
If the media had an ounce of integrity, and held both parties responsible for their actions, our country would be a much better place.
More of his experience at both being a Secret Service Special Agent and his run for both the Senate and House of Representatives. What he learned from both and lessons he has learned from serving and his recommendations on getting the nation back on the right track.
I did not enjoy the writing - repetitive, overly ornate. I did not enjoy the rhetoric - straw man arguments, simplistic, factional thinking, repeating as fact opinions about "the liberal establishment Democratic party".
And I did not like the politics. Not necessarily the revisiting of the Republican 2016 Greatest Hits (Sibelius, emails, Obamacare, Benghazi, Bo Bergdahl), or the lazy shortcuts about big government vs the panacaea of the free market and private enterprise. The author does not make any attempt to explain what his vision for conservatism actually is.
One example is the story about a town hall in Baltimore where he points out that the wealthy are sending their kids to well funded schools in the suburbs, while inner city schools are underfunded, due to education being a mandate funded by property taxes at a local level. I *agree* - I think most people would - that this is wrong. But the Republican party wants to gut the Department of Education, and send the education mandate back to the states. How does that do *anything* to provide more funding to inner city schools? Using local taxes for education is one of the most perverse injustices in the US. The people who most need funding get the least. The question is how to fix it? He presents no solution.
If you are into politics, this book is for you! Dan Bongino is a former Secret Service Agent who has made two bids to run for national office. His book, The Fight, is not only an inside look at life in and around the White House and security details for the President and other VIPs, he discusses in detail the obstacles thrown in his path by the "Establishment" politics as well as media bias that kept his message from getting the public attention it deserved and should have gotten in a media world that otherwise should be fair and impartial but isn't. I thoroughly enjoyed reading this book. It gave me an insight to Washington and local politics that I have only known from the edges. More importantly, there are leadership lessons embedded in the book that anyone in business can learn from. It is a very enlightening and enjoyable book to read. Who should read it? Anyone interested in politics, interested in possibly running for a political office, anyone interested in improving their leadership styles and effectiveness and anyone who votes! That covers just about everyone.
It opened with a chapter about Dan losing his political campaign which I think set the mentality of “I’m mad so I’m going to write a book about what’s wrong with the Secret Service to show my hatred”. A Republican picking apart the Democrat president was also very prominent throughout the book. If you’re going to tell the readers that these problems have been happening for decades, then don’t point the blame on the White House under one President.
On a positive note, it was a bit interesting learning about the Secret Service. Some things I had always assumed and some things took me by surprise.
question authority, not on my watch, abuse of power by irs gsa fbi cia hhs and more with bad atmosphere, media role to report though media conformance instead and no credibility, the left and Obama prefer sacrifice of others and throw anyone under the bus, facts be damned like Clinton debt from 4.4 to 5.8T, get big to save country.
I was hoping to get more of the inner working of the Secret Service but this seemed mainly to be a book to introduce Dan to voters so he can run for something.
I thought I wouldn't be able to finish this book, because Bongino was just going on and on about bureaucracy.
I've only read one other book in which there are paragraphs that extend more than a page over and over again: Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations." And this is a short book! Also, a little editing could have helped for other stylistic problems. How many times could he have used the same word more than once in the same sentence?
In the end, it is a pretty good book. It has energy, though it is a sort of "apology" for his two electoral defeats, Bongino demonstrates how he extracted victory - and knowledge - from defeat.
And the memories came flooding back for me, because Bongino mentioned his experience at Leisure World. My experience related to Leisure World was in no way similar to Bongino's, but it was definitely a learning experience.
These pages also stood out: "diffuse costs" vs. "concentrated interests" p. 110-111. "defacto secession" and Ron Paul p. 112.
Based on the writing alone, the book probably deserves 3 stars. But because of the importance of the subject matter and the succinct way Bongino expresses key points, I give it 4 stars.
Dan Bongino is a class act, a rarity among those who run for Congress. In a short, interesting, easy-to-read book, Bongino lays out point after major point about where we are as a country. And we're not in a good place. What is so frustrating is that it is all fixable if only people would quit buying into the "us" versus "them" mentality. Grassroots Republicans are in open revolt against their "establishment" right now. Grassroots Democrats are getting there as well. It is time for the politicos to quit playing games. I'm afraid our time is getting short if we continue on the same path.
Coincidentally, I read this book and the author's first book at the same time. The first one ("Life Inside the Bubble") is more of a memoir while this one is his policy prescriptions for our nation. The other book is MUCH more readable. Whether this is due to his closer ties to the subject matter, having a better ghost writer, or having a better editor (or all three), I don't know. The meandering, clause-laden sentences in this book made me feel like I was wading through mud to get to the points Bongino was trying to make.
I struggled to figure out what focus and purpose Dan Bongino had in writing this book. He really writes about three things but mixes them up together. He writes about his experiences as a secret service agent during the terms of Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama. He does gives some great insights into the behind the scenes things and some of the failures of the agency. He also writes about his experiences as a political candidate, running for the U.S. Senate in Maryland in 2012 and for the U.S. House in Maryland's Sixth Congressional District in 2016. He also writes a campaign manual from his lessons learned in his two political campaigns, both of which ended in failure.
There is no doubt that each of these areas left an indeliable mark on Bongino, along with his experiences as a police officer for the NYPD, which he also eludes to. However, blending the political machine and the Secret Service failings doesn't work well in his case. The stories are great but they are all separate narratives. If he was doing a tell all on things he witnessed as an agent but kept the focus there, this would be an excellent read. However, a book about the political machine written by a failed candidate just isn't too compelling of a read. Just when we get a great story that captures interest, we read more mundane stuff about how to run a political campaign.
Overall, it was an okay read. The stories make up for the lack of focus.
There was a lot of interesting information in here about how politics actually works, and the author can tell a good story. The only real problem I had with this book, as someone who's probably a bit left of center, was that it felt as though there were parts that were attacks on all lefties. Given who he is, it is unsurprising, but when he says things like all politicians are corrupt but only actually addresses particular politicians on the left, it feels sometimes disingenuous. The Clinton's and Obamas aren't the only problematic presidents; all are horribly problematic, and that's how they achieved the presidency in the first place. It was kind of a turn-off, but I'm probably not what he considers his target audience, so I get why he did it.
He can really tell a great story though, so I think his first book which is supposedly more of a biography might be my cup of tea.
Read this book for my 2016 Book Challenge "A Political Memoir". You can tell a politician wrote it... One paragraph lasted from the end of page 138 to the top of 141. He easily could have sold ice to an Eskimo or a heater to an Arizonian.
The book started with him recounting his loss on becoming a congressman. It was a great first chapter and held promise for the rest of the book. It then evolved into a rant on his stint in the secret service and failures within the government, which he then tried to loop around to the reason behind his defeat.
It was interesting getting some inside stories but overall I felt as though it was a "poor me" tale with a ton of negativity tossed in.
I don’t read a lot of political books, so this was a new thing for me, and a bit outside my comfort zone at first. It helped a lot when he took a step back from the politics and focused on the Secret Service, more experiential, side of things. After a bit of that, I got into it a lot more and it went very quickly. I really appreciated his view and how he brings the reader/listener into situations with him, clearly explaining where he’s coming from and how certain decisions have had such profound effects. The teamwork ideal deeply resonated with me.
Overall, it was an interesting combination of political observations and high-stress job experiences, and I’m glad to have read it.
If you’re expecting a book about cool secret service agent stories, pick another book.
Horrid. The book’s front cover and full title are both part of a larger straw man fallacy for a Democratic Party beat down and Obama bash session. The book is a repetitive cycle of Republican Party praise and Democratic Party hate. Terrible argument style with poorly ordered logic, big jumps to conclusions, and a sprinkle of “know-it-all” arrogance. For the utopia he writes of, he sure does bash the Democratic Party for doing the same.
Excellent book explaining what the Secret Service does. Dan Bongino writes about his time with the service. He also writes about the good and the bad and how it can be improved. I also listen to Dan Bongino's Podcasts which are a good source for current events especially with what is happening at this time.
I found this book somewhat more revealing of an inside look at the Secret Service. Although not a true exposé of the Secret Service, it does a good job of describing the sorts of threats the Secret Service is charged with meeting, as well as the difficulties in meeting those threats, ending with offering proposed solutions. A good read.
An insider look at the Secret Service. If you’re looking for salacious details, it’s not in this book. I feel very depressed after reading it. This was written in 2015 and the massively overreaching government is much worse now. We may be past the tipping point of returning power to “We The People.”