What do you think?
Rate this book
Address of the Central Committee to the Communist League
Este eBook foi convertido ao formato digital por uma comunidade de voluntários. Você pode encontra-lo gratuitamente online. A compra da edição Kindle inclui os custos da entrega sem fio.
- GenresPolitics
Unknown Binding
First published December 1, 2012
4 people are currently reading
29 people want to read
About the author
Karl Marx
3,317 books6,648 followersWith the help of Friedrich Engels, German philosopher and revolutionary Karl Marx wrote
The Communist Manifesto
(1848) and
Das Kapital
(1867-1894), works, which explain historical development in terms of the interaction of contradictory economic forces, form many regimes, and profoundly influenced the social sciences.
German social theorist Friedrich Engels collaborated with Karl Marx on The Communist Manifesto in 1848 and on numerous other works.
Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin in London opposed Communism of Karl Marx with his antithetical anarchy.
Works of Jacques Martin Barzun include Darwin, Marx, Wagner (1941).
The Prussian kingdom introduced a prohibition on Jews, practicing law; in response, a man converted to Protestantism and shortly afterward fathered Karl Marx.
Marx began co-operating with Bruno Bauer on editing Philosophy of Religion of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (see Democritus and Epicurus), doctoral thesis, also engaged Marx, who completed it in 1841. People described the controversial essay as "a daring and original piece... in which Marx set out to show that theology must yield to the superior wisdom." Marx decided to submit his thesis not to the particularly conservative professors at the University of Berlin but instead to the more liberal faculty of University of Jena, which for his contributed key theory awarded his Philosophiae Doctor in April 1841. Marx and Bauer, both atheists, in March 1841 began plans for a journal, entitled Archiv des Atheismus (Atheistic Archives), which never came to fruition.
Marx edited the newspaper Vorwärts! in 1844 in Paris. The urging of the Prussian government from France banished and expelled Marx in absentia; he then studied in Brussels. He joined the league in 1847 and published.
Marx participated the failure of 1848 and afterward eventually wound in London. Marx, a foreigner, corresponded for several publications of United States.
He came in three volumes. Marx organized the International and the social democratic party.
Marx in a letter to C. Schmidt once quipped, "All I know is that I am not a Marxist," as Warren Allen Smith related in Who's Who in Hell .
People describe Marx, who most figured among humans. They typically cite Marx with Émile Durkheim and Max Weber, the principal modern architects.
Bertrand Russell later remarked of non-religious Marx, "His belief that there is a cosmic ... called dialectical materialism, which governs ... independently of human volitions, is mere mythology" ( Portraits from Memory , 1956).
More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bi...
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/...
http://www.historyguide.org/intellect...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic...
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/...
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/t...
German social theorist Friedrich Engels collaborated with Karl Marx on The Communist Manifesto in 1848 and on numerous other works.
Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin in London opposed Communism of Karl Marx with his antithetical anarchy.
Works of Jacques Martin Barzun include Darwin, Marx, Wagner (1941).
The Prussian kingdom introduced a prohibition on Jews, practicing law; in response, a man converted to Protestantism and shortly afterward fathered Karl Marx.
Marx began co-operating with Bruno Bauer on editing Philosophy of Religion of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (see Democritus and Epicurus), doctoral thesis, also engaged Marx, who completed it in 1841. People described the controversial essay as "a daring and original piece... in which Marx set out to show that theology must yield to the superior wisdom." Marx decided to submit his thesis not to the particularly conservative professors at the University of Berlin but instead to the more liberal faculty of University of Jena, which for his contributed key theory awarded his Philosophiae Doctor in April 1841. Marx and Bauer, both atheists, in March 1841 began plans for a journal, entitled Archiv des Atheismus (Atheistic Archives), which never came to fruition.
Marx edited the newspaper Vorwärts! in 1844 in Paris. The urging of the Prussian government from France banished and expelled Marx in absentia; he then studied in Brussels. He joined the league in 1847 and published.
Marx participated the failure of 1848 and afterward eventually wound in London. Marx, a foreigner, corresponded for several publications of United States.
He came in three volumes. Marx organized the International and the social democratic party.
Marx in a letter to C. Schmidt once quipped, "All I know is that I am not a Marxist," as Warren Allen Smith related in Who's Who in Hell .
People describe Marx, who most figured among humans. They typically cite Marx with Émile Durkheim and Max Weber, the principal modern architects.
Bertrand Russell later remarked of non-religious Marx, "His belief that there is a cosmic ... called dialectical materialism, which governs ... independently of human volitions, is mere mythology" ( Portraits from Memory , 1956).
More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bi...
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/...
http://www.historyguide.org/intellect...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic...
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/...
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/t...
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
July 31, 2024
10 páginas imprescindibles sobre la organización independiente de clase
December 27, 2021
¡Cuánto daño le sigue haciendo el reformismo a la revolución!
November 7, 2025
Seemingly razor sharp analysis of the constituencies in post 1848 German politics, with very careful attention paid to common and contradictory interests; of course I’m too ignorant to say if any of this was true, but it all seems very plausible. And a lot of it rings true for contemporary American politics, with the democrats using the state to bribe workers while protecting property at all costs. But now they don’t really even pay lip service to workers or socialism, they’re explicitly pandering to the petty-bourgeoisie–the much celebrated American middle class.
The strategy–support the petty-bourgeois faction against the liberals, but oppose their property-preserving measures in favor of direct worker control–follows clearly from the analysis. This is a nice appendix to the communist manifesto insofar as it fills in lots of details, the most important being worker armies, worker candidates, worker councils, state appropriation of private property (and apparently even communal property??), and state centralization. The problems with this approach are obvious to a 21st century reader, but I think I would have to read some anarchists to get a sense of contemporary criticism from the left. I also suspect a classical republican criticism would be pretty convincing.
This is furthermore a nice complement to the manifesto because the closing note is stronger: “Their battle cry must be: The Revolution in Permanence!” If Marxism still means something besides social democracy it would be this.
The strategy–support the petty-bourgeois faction against the liberals, but oppose their property-preserving measures in favor of direct worker control–follows clearly from the analysis. This is a nice appendix to the communist manifesto insofar as it fills in lots of details, the most important being worker armies, worker candidates, worker councils, state appropriation of private property (and apparently even communal property??), and state centralization. The problems with this approach are obvious to a 21st century reader, but I think I would have to read some anarchists to get a sense of contemporary criticism from the left. I also suspect a classical republican criticism would be pretty convincing.
This is furthermore a nice complement to the manifesto because the closing note is stronger: “Their battle cry must be: The Revolution in Permanence!” If Marxism still means something besides social democracy it would be this.
December 29, 2024
texto breve e imprescindible acerca de la organización revolucionaria
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews