Lana hunts monsters for a living. She absolutely hates hunting ghosts. So, of course, a friend is calling in a favor and having her hunt a ghost. Not just any ghost, but Old Anne - an urban legend at Movieland, a theme park inspired by the golden age of Hollywood.
Worse still, Lana used to work at Movieland, and was fired after she had a... little incident killing three vampires on park property. So in addition to hunting ghosts—which she doesn’t want to do—she has to sneak around and not get noticed by her former coworkers.
This is Book 3 of #iHunt. But it’s a completely standalone story—you don’t need to have read the others to get this.
Content Warning: Drug use, violence, minor gore, descriptions of anxiety attacks.
Bios are tough. I'm an author and game designer based out of Tokyo. I've a soft spot for horror, urban fantasy, and science fiction. I write about vampires, about social issues, and the intersection of mythology and real life. I believe stories about monsters are actually stories about people, and that every good story about monsters is a story about the way people live and interact.
Should I have written that in the third person? That'd be weird, wouldn't it? "Olivia Hill is an author and game designer based out of..." It's really awkward, if you know I'm writing it about myself. But isn't this commentary kind of meta anyway? Is this really the purview of author bio? Do I really need to be worrying about this when the world could fall apart at any minute? Should I really be writing books when I only have a limited time on this earth, and could theoretically be doing something more meaningful? Does anything have meaning?
Long story short, you should buy my books. Because what if they're actually very important? What if they change the world, the way Bill & Ted changed the world with Wyld Stallyns? Wouldn't you want to be part of that before it's a thing?
The story is another winner, I do wish it had been a bit more fleshed out but it was enjoyable nonetheless. Again there were some editing errors but that has improved as well. This time it seemed like the editor did at least run it through spell check, they just didn't read the actual content to make sure the correct version s of words were used.