Klasik bilişsel-davranışçı yaklaşımla günümüzün fizyoloji odaklı yaklaşımı arasında başarılı bir denge kuran bu kitap, bilişsel psikolojinin "beyin ve biliş", "algı", "dikkat", "belek", "imgeleme", "dil" ve "düşünme" gibi temel konu ve kavramlarını açıklıyor ve daha üst düzeyde çalışmalar için zemin hazırlıyor. Olgular ve tanımlar örneklerle ve hemen her sayfada yer alan şema, grafik ve fotoğraf benzeri görselerle destekleniyor. Kuramlar deneylerle somutlaştırılıp günlük yaşamdaki uygulamalarla pratiğe geçiriliyor. Ayrıca her bir kuramın güçlü ve zayıf noktaları vurgulanarak diğer kuramlarla karşılaştırma imkânı sunuluyor.
Bu kitabı yazmaya karar verdiğimde, 500'den fazla eğitmenle yapılan bir anket ve meslektaşlarımla yaptığım görüşmelerden yola çıkarak birçok öğrencinin bilişsel psikolojiyi çok soyut ve kuramsal bulduğunu, gündelik hayatla bağlantı kuramadıklarını gördüm. Bilişsel psikolojinin öyküsünü somut bir şekilde anlatarak öğrencilerin deneysel araştırmalar, bilişsel psikoloji ve günlük deneyimler arasındaki bağlantıları görmesine karar verdim. Her bölümde gerçek hayattan örnekler, vaka incelemeleri, küçük deneyler kulandım. 2. ve 3. baskılarda derslerdeki öğrencilerimden ve 1500'ün üzerinde yazılı talepten gelen geribildirimleri değerlendirerek kitabı günceledim. E. Bruce Goldstein
E. BRUCE GOLDSTEIN is an Associate Professor Emeritus of Psychology at the University of Pittsburgh and Adjunct Professor of Psychology at the University of Arizona. He received the Chancellor's Distinguished Teaching Award from the University of Pittsburgh for his classroom teaching and textbook writing. He received his bachelor's degree in Chemical Engineering from Tufts University and his Ph.D. in Experimental Psychology from Brown University. He was a postdoctoral fellow in the Biology Department at Harvard University before joining the faculty at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Goldstein has published papers on a wide variety of topics, including retinal and cortical physiology, visual attention and the perception of pictures. He is the author of SENSATION AND PERCEPTION, 10th Edition (Cengage, 2017), and the editor of the BLACKWELL HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION (Blackwell, 2001) and the two-volume SAGE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PERCEPTION (Sage, 2010).
Also actually a fantastic textbook for my cognitive psychology course, really informational with great examples, diagrams and explanations, but just don't want Goodreads recommending more like this to me haha got to keep the algorithm going
I read the whole damn thing from cover to cover so I'm sure as hell gonna include it in my book count for this year. Good book, though, clear and not too dense, would probably be comprehensible even to someone who has not studied psychology before.
This the first actual textbook that I have reviewed, and overall, it was alright. There was a lot of good information included, and overall, the text was clear and easy to read. Some of the personal examples included by the author were informative, but many of them felt extraneous. The one issue that I noticed was that there were a lot more spelling, grammar, and typing errors than I normally come across in textbooks. Overall, this is not a bad choice for an introductory course in Cognitive Psychology.
I used this as the textbook when I taught a class on cognitive psychology. It does a decent job summarizing the history and modern state of the field. It is well organized and easy to read. However, the writing is indirect at times and could be shortened (especially the fictional anecdotes). There are also several typos, some of which cause confusion (e.g., mislabeled figure numbers). I would use it again for my class, but I would not hesitate to switch to another textbook if there is a cheaper option.
Good textbook. Lots of images to break up the dread of how many terms there are to memorize in every page (typical psyc). It explains things well and tries to not make the book constant heavy reading, i had little difficulty understanding any concepts save the visual imagery chapter which was somewhat confusing. Per usual it was the memorizing of terms which was the challenge but the book has a good definition dictionary in the back which helps.
This was a dope read. One of few textbooks I actually enjoyed consuming; never felt laborious or like I was being “forced” to get through assigned readings.
It was a fine introduction to cognitive psychology. Nothing particularly stood out to me, but it was informative and gave me a good basis for the subject matter. I liked the interactive portions that allowed you to see what experiments would feel like. I disliked how many anecdotes there were, or rather how long they were, when I would prefer get into the important details.
Ich bin erstaunt, wie anschaulich, umfangreich, und kurzweilig ein Lehrbuch der Psychologie sein kann. Das Lehrbuch ist didaktisch äußerst gut aufbereitet, und bietet neben einer guten, verständlichen Strukturierung der Thematiken, auch Übungsaufgaben, um das gelesene zu rekapitulieren. Dienlich der Sache sind ebenso die ausgesuchten und cleveren Experimente, welche den Stoff einem näherbringen und leichter verständlich machen. Trotz des relativ großen Umfanges, fehlte mir hier ein wenig mehr Tiefe - so zum Beispiel wurde nicht, oder nur indirekt die Hyperkolumnen und die Blobs in den okulären Dominanzsäulen erwähnt, deren Entdeckung, wie auch die der K-Zellen, der Koniobahn, doch schon länger bekannt ist. Auch der ausführliche mathematische Teil fehlte hier. Nichtsdestotrotz sollte man nicht außer Acht lassen, dass es sich hierbei um einen Grundkurs handelt, und die Erwartungen dessen erfüllt dieses kleine Meisterwerk allemal.
A decent introduction to the field of cognitive psychology. Provides a clear overview of most of the major areas of research as well as priming one to read the literature in the field. A lot of the research is basic and not exactly groundbreaking but that's probably to be expected given how little we really know about how the mind functions.
Interesting and important facts, somewhat pedagogic layout with a bit of self test questions, pictures and graphs. Summaries are a bit too long. The stories about Rachel were terrible and boring. Who orders a pizza with broccoli on it?