Creation's Tiny Mystery

by Robert V. Gentry

Gentry, Robert V.

Genres: Science

Paperback

First published January 1, 1986

Reviews

[Stuart · Rating 3 out of 5]

Good reference for creation. Establishes evidence for a creation and flood.

Unfortunate the "story" is more about the author and his trials against the evolution evil empire.

[David Craig · Rating 5 out of 5]

A worthy read.

A very informative read, that also exposes the human nature and drive of the scientific community(that not surprisingly goes against its own so called principles), in which all too many people treat with awe and majesty, uttering all their conclusions without question and that which drives them as if without fault, and totally pure.

[Jeffrey · Rating 5 out of 5]

An often overlooked wealth of data pertaining to special creation. Dr. Robert Gentry's research into Radio-Polonium halos, point to the Genesis 1:8-10 record of creation.

"Creation's Tiny Mystery" presents a fascinating and compelling argument for creation contrary to the arbitrary, billions of years, theory posited by evolution theory. The existence of the short half-life Radio-Polonium halos in granite give evidence of the Earth forming cold, in water, exactly as the Genesis account states.

This book also show the bias, discriminatory, and unfair treatment by the mainstream science community in their attempts to censure & punish Dr. Robert Gentry for his research and findings that fly in the face of the science community's rigidly adhered to theory of evolution.

[Lejla · Rating 1 out of 5]

When I bought the book, I thought it's more about gathering all science experiments in one place that approves the existence of God. I was really disappointed. The author, basically through all the books, makes statements regarding his injustice. As a scientist, I agree that we shouldn't be biased against new unusual ideas. I think the author wasted his years chasing clouds. But if it was, in his opinion, a good decision and if he was happy while doing his research, I'm glad. The author is detailed, and even if the reader is not a scientist, it's easy to understand.