The Drama of Scripture is a book thats main idea is to tie together the diverse stories, teachings, themes, and people of the Bible to present it as a complete picture of God's working with His creation. The book separates the Bible into 6 acts. They are as follows: 1) God Establishes His kingdom, 2) Rebellion in the Kingdom, 3) The King Chooses Israel: Redemption Initiated, (Interlude: A kingdom Story Waiting for an Ending: The Intertestamental Period), 4) The Coming of the King: Redemption Accomplished, 5) Spreading the News of the King: The Mission of the Church, and 6) The Return of the King: Redemption Completed.
The book is very neatly divided into these sections, primarily by Old and New Testaments. The authors bring about many interesting facts throughout their writing that I never really knew. I found these little tidbits of information to be enlightening to some of the stories of the Bible that I was familiar with. The interesting facts they brought about shed new light and understanding on passages of Scripture somewhat familiar to me. Things such as: Lamech being the first poet and then using if for evil (49), and Noah being the first winemaker and then using that for evil as well (51). Towards the beginning of the book I thought the entire thing was going to be very dry and repetitive, basically a book repeating what the Bible already says in a different and quicker way. But as the reading went on I started to enjoy it much more.
Other aspects I found interesting were that the book was a good refresher on subjects of the Bible that I have quickly forgotten about in my study. Things such as the Israelite feasts, their significance, and their meaning (73-74); Moses having a first and second sermon in Deuteronomy (77); a good refresher on God's justification for genecide (78); the reasoning behind Israel's failure during the judges period (85-86); and a synapsis of First and Second Kings, as well as first and second Chronicles (easy to forget their purposes) (92). The section on the intertestamental period was also very interesting and brought much significance to me. I have never had the privilege yet of studying the subject, and even though the discussion was brief I did learn some new things that will help with my New and Old Testament interpretation of Scripture. There were many things in this book that brought a lot of enlightenment to me, and that is one of the main reasons I enjoyed it.
As the book continued the authors theological positions became more and more apparent. The taking of many things symbolically and allegorically, not just prophecy (87, Samuels being a Nazarite having symbolic meaning) . The authors continually referred to the kingdom of God as an "already, not yet" concept. They did this in context to Jesus day, as well as bringing that into our day. They explained that the Jews had a misconception from Old Testament prophecy that the kingdom of God and the Messiah would come cataclysmically. In their section on the gospels they summarized four misconceptions that the Jews had about the kingdom of God and why they were wrong. They were: 1) The kingdom does not come all at once, 2) The present kingdom does not come with irresistible power, 3) The final judgement of the kingdom is reserved for the future, 4) the full revelation of the kingdom is postponed, to allow many to ender it during the present age. Although this concept was interesting (because I do not to often get to read from those from a different theological perspective), I had a hard time agreeing with it. I will say that the authors did a great job at unifying Scripture, but they do fail in some aspects to recognize some of the specifics of the text in regards ecclesiology and eschatology. The reference to the kingdom being "already, not yet" is something I have always recognized to be a progressive dispensationalist idea, but I do not know if the authors specifically adhere to this view. There were some aspects that sounded amillennial, and they did not refer to Bock and Blaisings work on the subject of progressive dispensationalism either (from what I saw in the notes).
The authors also did an awesome job of showing the significance of the cross in regards to the ancient context of crucifixion and the humility of it. Even to the point of presenting an ancient child's cartoon drawing of a donkey on a cross and a man worshipping it. The idea that God was crucified was laughable to the ancient world, and the authors really brought out the idea wonderfully. I will say this though, that the authors did not present the gospel in a very straightforward manner, and camped much more upon the idea of the kingdom of God, and kingdom living rather than salvation by grace through faith. I do not know much about the authors beyond that they adhere to a different theological school of thought that I do, but the gospel was not very apparent.
I did like the book. Overall, what I gathered and appreciated from the book was the tying together of Scripture as a whole, the extra bits of information that I never knew, the reading from a different theological perspective, and the reminder of the crucifixion. As regards my ministry in the future, I feel that this book helped me to see the Bible through a different lens than I normally would. The book showing the Bible as very unified helped me see the grand theme of salvation that God has for people. Normally I look at the Bible as either application to my own life, or for theological purposes. I think the book, although it was not its purpose, will help me to appreciate those peoples opinions about Scripture that are not exactly the same as my own. I have recognized before that other forms of theology that see salvation as the unifying theme of the Bible find it easier to revel in the cross. That was the case in this book. I believe the book will also serve as a great tool to walk a new convert who does not know that much about the BIble through it. I very much appreciated the book, and am looking forward to using its contents in the future.