There is such a major gap in statistical writing, in my opinion. As someone who literally stumbled into statistics via required classes during my masters degree and gradually became fascinated and passionate about the topic and now even teach it, we too often start with the boring methodological minutiae. WHY do we need statistics? What exactly is it doing under the hood aside from spitting out p-values that tell me whether I can publish my findings (calm down, this is a joke...!)?
What I love about this book is that it starts with the big picture instead of diving immediately into the nitty gritty of the methods (although all of that is there, too). I don't think I've encountered this anywhere else in stats/ML writing, but he starts with some anecdotes about situations where interpretability is a key element of machine learning. These anecdotes come in very handy when I debate my computer science trained brother and other people outside academia about interpretability, so already I'm a fan. (This is another topic, but I really think scientists need to work on this type of applied communication. So much more useful than yet another dry academic paper).
As someone who again uses stats all the time but doesn't have a stats background (which I would wager is true of the vast majority of those actually using statistics, actually), the other major pro is how accessibly written the methods are. Arcane academic language is entirely avoided, and there is minimal discussion of anything related to deep mathiness like multiplying matrices, etc, etc (my personal least favorite aspect of statistics, sorry). Christoph also has written the iml package and stores the code for the book on github, and I was able to very easily use both to quickly create an impressive ICE and pdp plot for a publication.
Highly recommend for anyone dipping their toes into the constantly expanding world of machine learning. Also recommend following Christoph on Twitter for thought provoking conversations on the future of ML methods and beyond.