What do you think?
Rate this book
Quantum Gravity: Reasoning with New Physics
The reproducibility of facts is the hallmark of a natural science, the impossibility of counting up to infinity that of a measuring process, and the "law of great numbers" that of statistics. A statement like "Nothing will come from nothing, and nothing gets lost" will yield conservation laws. Bell's own interpretation of his no-go theorems, then, will directly give Quantum Gravity, and its iteration the unification of all types of forces of nature ("New Physics").
The present paper will outline the reasoning of Quantum Gravity and of New Physics rather than their technical details - as far as all that allows for separating those issues from each other.
Thermodynamic principles are imposing 2 alternative channels to A closed system will yield the reaction channel conserving probabilty, and an open system the dynamic channel. Causality will mark the open channel, entanglement the reaction channel. Parities are the key to understanding a black hole free of singularities.
Space, time, and mass can be counted from the non-valence parts of a particle as occurrence rates of special double-quant properties; Higgs is dispensable. The spectrum of stable particles derives from the representation of our static multiverse. Its building universes give us the illusion of motion (like by a flip book).
Lagrange's formalism and its canonical quantization prove as classical dead locks of obsolete centuries. The multitude of positive results - like the fine-structure constant calculated correctly, e.g. - speak in favour of New Physics, the total absence of "broken" quantum numbers in favour of a deeper "understanding" of nature.
The present paper will outline the reasoning of Quantum Gravity and of New Physics rather than their technical details - as far as all that allows for separating those issues from each other.
Thermodynamic principles are imposing 2 alternative channels to A closed system will yield the reaction channel conserving probabilty, and an open system the dynamic channel. Causality will mark the open channel, entanglement the reaction channel. Parities are the key to understanding a black hole free of singularities.
Space, time, and mass can be counted from the non-valence parts of a particle as occurrence rates of special double-quant properties; Higgs is dispensable. The spectrum of stable particles derives from the representation of our static multiverse. Its building universes give us the illusion of motion (like by a flip book).
Lagrange's formalism and its canonical quantization prove as classical dead locks of obsolete centuries. The multitude of positive results - like the fine-structure constant calculated correctly, e.g. - speak in favour of New Physics, the total absence of "broken" quantum numbers in favour of a deeper "understanding" of nature.
103 pages, Kindle Edition
Published January 9, 2018
169 people are currently reading
46 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
April 11, 2018
Gravity
Amazing, there is still much to understand, should we be worried about covalent bonds reversing? Could it be possible that science has missed the appropriate formulae, after all Newton wrote about F=MA, the things that were discussed in the book briefly mentioned are scratching the door of discovery but it will be years before it is fully understood.
Think about the following --how much every is needed to travel at the speed of light on the planet Earth? If that same object was in a gravity (or reduced) free environment would it necessitate the same amount of energy? We can assume that if we just build a perpetual motion device then we will reach light speed , it is after all the comprehension of safe proton manipulation --so close, a change in direction by a mere five minutes on the section will allow science to
Amazing, there is still much to understand, should we be worried about covalent bonds reversing? Could it be possible that science has missed the appropriate formulae, after all Newton wrote about F=MA, the things that were discussed in the book briefly mentioned are scratching the door of discovery but it will be years before it is fully understood.
Think about the following --how much every is needed to travel at the speed of light on the planet Earth? If that same object was in a gravity (or reduced) free environment would it necessitate the same amount of energy? We can assume that if we just build a perpetual motion device then we will reach light speed , it is after all the comprehension of safe proton manipulation --so close, a change in direction by a mere five minutes on the section will allow science to
November 23, 2019
A quote from Claus B.:
The theory of fundamental physics is withering away under the dictate of lobbyists in the ivory-tower of one of the last strongholds of the stubborn Middle Ages before Enlightenment 2.0. Imploringly they are clutching at straws, at the curious waste of continuum physics out of date, raping mathematics. They still continue ignoring the signs of the times according to which that classic infinitesimal calculus of past centuries long since has exceeded its zenith.
Dr. Tongue: They laughed at me in Budapest. They laughed at me in Prague!
Bruno: They laughed at you in Buffalo, too.
Don't get me wrong. Cranky, ranting Birkholz is the best Birkholz. Don't talk to him about "peer review" when he is already, since the death of Einstein, practically peerless.
The theory of fundamental physics is withering away under the dictate of lobbyists in the ivory-tower of one of the last strongholds of the stubborn Middle Ages before Enlightenment 2.0. Imploringly they are clutching at straws, at the curious waste of continuum physics out of date, raping mathematics. They still continue ignoring the signs of the times according to which that classic infinitesimal calculus of past centuries long since has exceeded its zenith.
Dr. Tongue: They laughed at me in Budapest. They laughed at me in Prague!
Bruno: They laughed at you in Buffalo, too.
Don't get me wrong. Cranky, ranting Birkholz is the best Birkholz. Don't talk to him about "peer review" when he is already, since the death of Einstein, practically peerless.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews