REREAD REVIEW: Upon reread, have a pretty similar opinion as the first time I read it. Annoying partisan toward Trotsky, but still a very handy crash course on the subject. Kind of interesting/cool to read this two years later and, after having read up more on the subject for the book I'm writing about the time period, have a much stronger grasp of the stuff it's covering.
ORIGINAL REVIEW: Germany had arguably the strongest socialist movement in the entire world in the early 1900s. How, then, did socialism fail there while succeeding in Russia? And how did a country with such a strong socialist movement not only fail to achieve socialism, but fall to fascism? This short book is about the failed 1918-19 German Revolution, its aftermath, Germany during the 1920s, and of course the unfortunate ascent of fascism at the beginning of the 1930s. Sewell gives his own take on all of the questions that arise from such a fascinating, important, dire time period.
Sewell is a dyed in the wool Trotskyite. I don't have a problem with that- I don't have a particular defined tendency as a socialist, and I've read some Trot stuff before that I've liked- but Sewell is uncompromising. Every figure, organization, or political bloc who makes a decision that went against Trotsky's line is either a reformist traitor, ultra-left adventurist, Stalinist, or whatever other dismissive term Sewell wants to throw their way. No one, apparently, has ever disagreed with Trotsky/Trotskyite thinking and had good points.
But any good student of history knows that every historical work has its own thesis/subsequent bias and that your task is to read while taking that perspective into account, rather than just dismissing it entirely. After all, there is no such thing as an untainted, perfectly objective history existing somewhere out there in the wild. So, reading this book with a critical eye, I found in incredibly useful.
The book is great at being concise while still providing a class-informed, pro-worker account of everything happening during this time. It was illuminating for me. The only reason I give this 4 stars, as opposed to 5, is that his aforementioned bias is so strong that I barely get a sense of where the interesting fissures and areas of debatable interpretation are for this time period. It's hard to know what most leftwing historians/analysts would agree upon and what is a specifically Trot interpretation of everything, since Sewell states everything with such certainty. The only debate I could pick up on is if the 1923 planned German worker uprising could've succeeded or not, since Sewell spent so much time defending his argument that it could have.
Still, overall, I definitely found this a useful and worthwhile read. Next I'll be reading a more standard liberal, rather than leftist, history of the same time period (though the focus will be more on the rise of the fascists; I'm not sure what part, if any, the 1918-19 German Revolution will play in this next book). It'll be interesting to see how the two books compare!