I received this book in a Goodreads Giveaway in exchange for an honest review.
In the novel of the same name, “Synod” refers to a secluded settlement in northern New Jersey’s Ramapough (sic) Mountains, c. 1829, that is inhabited by a small band of devoted Protestant abolitionists. It operates as a way station for runaway slaves fleeing to New York or Canada during the fledging years of the Underground Railroad.
“Goldfinch” is the group’s ostensible leader, a prickly, taciturn man who is given to cryptic and violent dreams and waking visions. He intuits them to be prophetic messages meant to help the settlers face and vanquish the ruthless bounty hunters (often aided by corrupt government officials) who are determined to recover these runaway slaves—alive or dead—by any means possible, even if it means massacring all the residents and burning Synod to the ground in the process.
Woven into this are subplots that deal with relational issues among the settlers and other characters—infighting, jealously, love and lust, burn out, betrayal, to name a few.
I was especially interested in the setting, as I am originally from northern New Jersey and lived for many years in the Sterling Forest area of the Ramapo Mts., where the book largely takes place. I enjoyed having an experiential “sense of place” while reading, which enabled me to keenly visualize where many of the events occurred.
Despite being highly fictionalized, there are aspects to the book that are loosely based in fact, and certain people—Governor Peter Dumont Vroom, Senator Theodore Frelinghuysen, Lyman and Catherine Beecher, and others, actually existed. Knowing little about them, I found the book inspired me to find out more about their true place in the slavery/abolitionist movements.
That being said, I did find the book difficult to wade through, largely due to the distracting and confusing supernatural element the author inserted into the book. It figures heavily in how the plot unfolds, and how certain significant characters interact. Rather than being intriguing, I found it informed the book with a smoky and irritating air of unreality. From the discussion questions included at the back of the book, it appears that the author intends this to be viewed metaphorically and is also employing a “genre-bending” technique, which may appeal more to—and perhaps is actually targeted to—a Young Adult audience, for whom fantasy and supernatural themes have perennial appeal. If so, it would seem a good way to incite interest in this important topic in a readership that typically may not be drawn to this historical period.
There is also a lot of talk and “saber rattling” between Synod and various marauders before any actual physical confrontations ever take place. That the settlers believe they could ever talk a ruthless, hardened bounty hunter into abandoning his quest, coupled with their reticence to take any offensive measures when a productive opportunity presents itself, is hard to grasp, given that they all knew from the outset that this venture would lead to terrible violence and bloodshed. They continually shore up Synod’s ever-growing stockpile of arms and ammunition, but ostensibly only to be utilized when forced to act defensively. Despite some settlers’ views to the contrary, they remain preparatory but largely passive until the last possible moment and all other options—mainly fruitless “dialogues” with their assailants—are exhausted. For the most part they sit and wait until attacked, employing a no-violence-until-provoked philosophy that in this context is dangerously naïve and unrealistic. Deliberately putting themselves in a kill-or-be-killed arena makes such a position untenable and moot. It needlessly puts their lives, and, ironically, the lives of the slaves they are committed to saving, continually at risk of annihilation.
This "atmospheric" story is a worthy one, in which the author, admittedly, is intending to capture the “zeitgeist” of the time, rather than to create an embellished historical fiction woven around real characters and events. The barbarity of slavery and the fierce and brutish mentality of its adherents as well as the anti-slavery position of the abolitionists, are explicated well, almost to the point of being polemical, which may be why there is so much talk in lieu of action. This didactic slant, if you will, is another reason I believe the book may be targeted to a younger audience. However, for me, as an adult, and for the aforementioned reasons, the book was somewhat rough going, requiring considerably more “suspension of belief” than I was ultimately able to give.