While I do believe it is possible for one person from a certain country and culture to write, respectfully and accurately, about a completely different country and culture, this book did not make the cut.
There are several inaccuracies such as calling Landmark 81 "Landmark 8" and describing a smile as "confusing", while people smiling as a response to stress, embarassment, and adversity is a well-documented body language phenemenon in all cultures. What especially irks me is the condescending view on the Vietnam War and the history of invasions Vietnam has had to endure, which is diminished to "patriotism" and "younger brother attitude" by this author. Please refer to the following phrases:
"They like to play up the "David and Goliath" mystique to outsider. After all, how else could they have dared to take on China for a couple of thousand years and then, more recently, France and the United States?",
"[Vietnam] display all the tanacity and attention seeking, whether positive or negative, that typifies the behavior of younger male siblings around the world"
"it helps, of course, that they were undoubtedly the victors in their "war of national liberation"".
Are these not viewpoints of a colonizer conveniently forgetting Vietnam was invaded, colonized, and many villages massacred? The author, consciously or subconciously, views the bloody history of Vietnam through colonial eyes, which causes one to question whether the other aspects in the book were written under the same lenses.