Secret Germany is structured in three main parts. The first is a historical telling of the anti-Nazi resistance within the German army leadership, culminating in an attempt to assassinate Adolf Hitler. The second is an exploration of the life of Claus von Stauffenberg--the leader and vital energy of the resistance--and of the development of the personality and philosophy which lead him to his role in the resistance. The last part explores the roots and development of national socialism (Nazism).
The first part described above is comprised of Chapters 1-3. These chapters talk about the German resistance to Hitler. They describe a years-long period during which countless attempts were made on Hitler's life and numerous plans were made, analyzed, and abandoned for a coup d'etat. Time after time, attempts at assassination or a coup had to be abandoned because some small detail was not just right. The leaders involved in the anti-Hitler conspiracy believed Hitler to be a criminal and that he needed to be removed, but also had to contend with the consequences of his removal. They needed to remove him in a way which would not leave a vacuum to be filled by the SS, and which would not provide public sympathy for the SS. They needed to remove him in a way which would not lead to civil war and tear apart of the country they loved. And they needed to remove him in a way which would not leave the country vulnerable to invasion and total conquest by the Soviet Red Army, which they viewed as a worse fate for their people. Reading this opened up my eyes to just how difficult the moral choices before the German people were during this time. In retrospect we tend to think that everything was clear cut and black and white. But, as this book shows us, that is rarely the case.
The second part, consisting of Chapters 5-8 (I know, I skipped 4), outlines Claus von Stauffenberg as an individual. It reviews the influence that his family, religion, history, and culture had on the development of his ideas and personality. It talks especially about his relationship with a poet, Stefan George, who was tremendously influential in his development and his commitment to the ideals that led him to act. It presents Stauffenberg as the ideal balance between the man of thought and the man of action, and shows how this balance was precisely what led him to act to organize people and to attempt to take down Hitler. It also presents him as charitable and loving towards those over whom he presided. This section of the book made Stauffenberg a hero in my mind, and a figure to whose stature I aspire.
The last part of the book, comprised of Chapters 9-13, talks about history in terms of ideas which are developed through cultures to their logical ends. In this section, the authors show how the pre-German people existed in a state of allegiance to their leader, without the idea existing among them of allegiance to their country as such. They show how the Franco-Prussian war changed this and shifted their allegiance to their country, or to their identity as a group. They then outline the Volkisch movement and the influences of various cultural figures on the German persona, including Goethe, Nietzsche, and Stefan George. They show how this development of culture lead to what they call a collective identity crisis--the inability to decide whether the German people should be focused on thought and spirit or on action and militarism. They present Nazism and an answer to this question, favoring the militaristic man of action, while suppressing the man of thought and spirit with a surrogate religion in the form of national socialist ideology. In this light, Nazi Germany was not the product of Hitler and his ideas, but instead is the expression of this fundamental confusion in the German spirit, of which Hitler himself was simply an outward expression. In the end, the authors show how Stauffenberg was the product of essentially the same cultural influences and confusion, he himself embodying an alternative solution to the crisis as a proper balance between thought and action.
I found Secret Germany to be hugely inspiring, both in the example presented in Stauffenberg, as well as in their discussion of the power of ideas in the shaping of history.