I run into this book in the library of Tartu University several years ago, when I was myself considering the idea of continuing my studies in a very similar field as the author of this book. After, plans changed, and life happened, but I wonder if its course would have been different, had I read this book back then. Such was the impact of the account/memoir of a year spent by Rausing in an Estonian village conducting the field work for her own doctoral thesis. Having lived and experienced Estonia as a foreigner myself, I felt that some pages spoke directly to me.
There were two modes to my experience of being in Estonia, one almost surreal and extraordinary, and the other very real—reassuringly real—which had something to do with being in that landscape, so grey, so ordinary, so reassuring.
Rausing, originally from Sweden but living in London, spent a year in the Estonian village of Pürksi, once home of a large minority of Swedish speakers, doing her anthropological research. It was 1993, during the transition of Estonia from the planned to the market economy, and her research focused among other things on the demise of a collective farm.
Personal and collective memory, or the lack thereof, in uncertain times, are at the center of many considerations in this book, making it invaluable for those who, like me, has an interest in anthropology and memory studies.
One day in 1952 she fainted at work, and woke up to hallucinations, including a vision of Stalin, dead, lying in his grave. She saw the school in the village in flames […]. She saw, too, all the many records of surveillance, interviews with informers and interrogations incriminating local people, sucked up in a whirlwind above the manor house[…]. . Where was she, then, I wondered, on that fine line between religion, dissidence, and mental illness? She must, at least, have felt free, the freedom that madness brings in totalitarianism, because when her co-workers gathered around her, she told them what she saw.
This recount highlights the way in which politics can interfere and influence individual lives, a lesson we should not forget, when we take the freedom we have now as given.
He had died because some work at the kolkhoz had been given to a younger man. Timo later said he’d heard that he had drank himself to death. Someone else said he had died of a heart attack, or perhaps blood poisoning. Without a functioning state, causes of death were uncertain. He didn’t reach the life expectancy of the times, that dismal 60.5 years for men. Perhaps he actually did die of the combination of the causes people talked about, all of which were implicated in that low life expectancy; perhaps he died from alcohol, and a heart attack, and blood poisoning, and losing his job, and giving up.
There is also a sense of loss and nostalgia, the sense of something that however terrible it might have been for people experiencing it, it also constituted their life, their reality, the universe of their values, and was now disappearing forever as Estonia became absorbed in the “Western world”.
There was something liberating about their attitude towards material goods—they did not identify themselves with anything they owned. They did not think of others in terms of what they owned. Everyone on the collective farm owned not only roughly the same amount of things, but actually more or less exactly the same things. I thought then that perhaps we care too much about our belongings, our cleanliness, our fussy and fastidious material arrangements. Maybe something really is lost—time, and solidarity—in our obsession with material goods, our trap of savings, loans, and debts, our caring for the endless things that we collect along the way.
The first and completely deserved 5* of this year.