أنه مدير لإحدى شركات الاستثمار الخاصة، اشترى جاي شيلدون شركة تليفزيونية صغيرة من ذوات الاشتراك السلكي في الغرب الأوسط منذ سنوات مضت. وكان لا يعرف كثيرًا عن هذه الصناعة، ولكن بدا سعرها - ٨ ملايين دولار - مغريا، وأن هذه الصفقة يمكن أن تسمح له باختبار الأمر. وسرعان ما فهم جاي وشركاؤه الأمر وجعلوه تجارتهم الرائجة. فبعد عام واحد، أرادوا التوسع من خلال الحصول على الأنظمة المجاورة. وبعد تمحيص الأرقام، حسبوا أنهم يستطيعون دفع ١١ مليون دولار - وربما ١٢ مليون دولار على أقصى تقدير - ليقوموا بشراء شركة تليفزيونية أخرى في مدينة مجاورة. وبدأ جاي سلسلة ممتدة من المحادثات مع صاحبها، ولكن بعد شهرين من الشد والجذب، بدا واضحا أن كلا الطرفين بينهما تباعد كبير في السعر. قال صاحبها: "اسمع، إنني لم أقم بوضع لافتة تعلن عن رغبتي في البيع؛ فأنت الذي أتيت، وعليك أن تضع على مكتبي ١٥ مليون دولار نقدًا حتى تقنعني بالبيع. وربما ندمت بعد ذلك على هذا الرقم". فهم شيلدون أن هذه لم تكن خدعة، ولكنه استشعر أن المطلوب شيء غير واقعي. فبالمنطق المعروف، فإن طرفي الصفقة قد ورطا نفسيهما. فإذا كان آخر سعر طلبه البائع أعلى بثلاثة ملايين من أعلى سعر عرضه المشتري، فلن تكون هناك صفقة. أم أن هذا في إمكانك؟ قال شيلدون قبل أن ينهض ليغادر المكان: "اسمح لي بسؤال أخير: إذا كنت تعتقد أن نظامك يستحق خمسة عشر مليون دولار، فماذا عما لدينا من أنظمة؟". كانت الإجابة: "أوه، إن أنظمتكم تقل عن هذا بقليل. أفترض أنها تستحق أربعة عشر مليونا أو نحو ذلك". لقد قلب شيلدون الصفقة رأسا على عقب. فأصبح ببراعة بائعا بدلا من أن يكون مشتريا. ففي أقل مما يزيد على سنة، حرك نظامه ليكسب تقريبا ضعفي ما دفعته شركته أولا (وكان معظم هذا عن طريق الاستدانة). وكان لا يزال متفائلا بالقنوات ذات الاشتراك، ولكن عندما واجه هذا المالك الخاص - الذي كان سريعا حيال هذه الصناعة - كانت لدى شيلدون المهارة لتحويل طريق مسدود إلى صفقة رابحة. فكان الحل الذي قدمه حلا بارعا. ومع هذا، فكان أهم ما في الأمر هو سرعة بديهته. ففي الشيء الذي عاق أمله في الحصول على الشركة، وضع شيلدون بذرة صفقة أخرى ستخدمه بشكل أفضل. فعندما صرف نظره عن الخطة الأولى، أتت إليه الفكرة كأنها وميض.
MICHAEL WHEELER is an author, professor, and mediator whose work is at the forefront of negotiation scholarship and practice. He is a professor of Management Practice at the Harvard Business School where he teaches negotiation as well as a variety of executive courses. He advises corporate clients, trade organizations, and government agencies on negotiation issues in the United States and abroad.
The Art of Negotiation is a really good book, taking a different track than typical books on negotiation: rather than becoming hung up by the details of the tactics of individual negotiations, it talks about the overall strategy of negotiating, recognizing that while each negotiation is unique, there are similarities in between them.
This book also goes heavily into personal development, stressing the necessity of balancing opposing emotions, and entering a state of flow to allow you to improvise in very tough situations.
A must read for anybody who negotiates on a regular basis.
Don't expect cookie-cutter advises about negotiation. However, too many anecdotes and elaboration are distracting. I simply scanned and skimmed some pages to get the gist. I prefer self enrichment books to be straightforward with their points: present them succinctly, bolster them with anecdotes, and facilitate elaboration with few diagrams. Overall interesting, applicable in business, job interview or decision making in general.
Great book that taught me more about negotiation but it is a difficult book to read when you are not a native English speaker. I discovered tons of words that I have never heard of after five years living in an English speaking country. The ton is very formal.
This was a solid book regarding negotiation. I learned some good tactics to improve my skills in this area. Not my favorite book about this topic, but it was decent.
Wonderfully written and plenty of examples given. The ample amounts of examples were varied and relatable. The information was so natural seeming that I felt this knowledge was second nature. Wheeler references other scientists and books that give his material plenty of extra credibility. This is how I know it's good information, if it makes sense and can be adapted into life naturally and if there's other authors that you can draw from.
I would recommend this book for anybody who needs to do serious negotiating. I would even own this book.
Professor Michael A. Wheeler teaches negotiation at Harvard Business School. He is probably one of the best negotiation scholars in the world. In this book you will find Harvard's core lessons on negotiation. I graduated from the Mastery Negotiation executive program last year. Most of what is taught in that program can be found in this book, even with longer and more profound explanation. This book is a must if you want to learn or enhance your negotiation abilities.
I really liked it and recommend it to everyone at all levels. Prior to reading many books and due to my many other personal responsibilities, I couldn't get enough time to really write a personalized review, but this is really a good book you have to read.
The book lacks a credible process to negotiate. It's filled with various examples of negotiations gone well or wrong, it covers lots of possibilities but it falls short when it comes time to recommend a path forward.
The book is fairly simple to understand and can be considered a beginners guide into negotiation practices in day to day life. For more advanced practices, more advanced content may be required.
Las negociaciones siempre pueden terminar en infinidad de posibles acuerdos, y este libro te ayuda a centrarte para llevar la negociación al mejor acuerdo posible. Teniendo bien tus bases, la negociación puede ir en varias direcciones, pero al menos no se te va de las manos. Pienso que en toda relación hay negociaciones, por eso es importante aprender a negociar.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
P31: You'd be in a weak position unless you lined up a fallback in advance. The point of the premortem exercise isn't to identify each and every possible way a deal might go wrong. // Rather, it's to foster an attitude of watchfulness, so you'll be quicker to see that the process is going awry. If you're alert, you may be able to get back on track. If not, you'll have a plan B.
P133: Negotiation vegabonds pinball their way through the process. // They overreact to whatever they saw or heard most recently. // Successful negotiators are flexible but not erratic. They start with a clear hypothesis about how to approach a case but then test it.
P144: Paradoxically, seeing something as a negotiation can make it harder to reach agreement.
P172: Bill Ury observes that when you say no to others, you're really affirming something that's important to you. // Bill recommends what he calls a yes-no-yes.
P218: Negotiations likewise has similar ebbs and flows. Proposals ignored or rejected early on can be revisited, revised and integrated later, when the parties realize that they are stuck.
P229: Beware of mislearning. Admitting that you don't know is better than operating from an erroneous conclusion.
P240: Before closing discussion of the case, I come back to the people who'd inform the owner that the property is underpriced // If the buyer wouldn't be able to use the property all the time, for instance, maybe she could rent it to the owner's family at a bargain rate // informing the seller seems like the most promising avenue for expanding the deal space.
P248: If they can't give you a yes or no, the most you should give them is a maybe.
The Art of Negotiation strongly focuses on preparation; yet, it does so in a different way. This book explains that no matter how much you prepare, it is generally never enough, and thing can still go in a direction you never saw coming. Wheeler discusses how the process of preparation, preparing for the best outcome and the worst outcome, helps you to think on your feet when the time for actual negotiation arrives. I thoroughly enjoyed his comparison the thinking process of preparing for a negotiation to playing chess. While I am not an avid chess player, or even a good chess player, his analogy gave a clear description of the way you should view the negotiation table. By understanding that there are many outcomes, and the relationship of the pieces, I can now see the importance over the whole process instead of just focusing on the end game. Any one wrong move can disrupt the entire outcome; yet, if you think/plan accordingly, your odds of coming to an agreement has greatly improved.
This book offers principles about negotiation and goes on to offer practical examples of how they are used. You get the best ideas from the most well known negotiation books, but with the brilliant twist of how these principles change in the ebb and flow of live negotiation.
From jazz to warfare, other fields are compared and learned from. Easy to read and full of specific ideas and stories, I highly recommend it. And if you think it's only for those who are "professional" negotiators, then you may need to rethink how often you negotiate in your personal and professional life.
I'm not a professional negotiator and I loved it and plan to do thing differently after reading it.
This is a fairly useful book for those who have never wondered about negotiation before. The theoretical part of the book is good, for it disclosures a comprehensive e friendly approach of negotiation, without moving to a romantic view of cooperation between the parts. There are a whole lot of examples and cases. They are helpful sometimes for a deeper comprehension of the theory but, most of time, they were tiresome for me, and the book could have been eighty pages shorter or so, without losing nothing of its richness. Thus, taking in account this prolixity with examples, I deprive this book of one star. Recommended.
Definitely, a book that needs to be in your reference library. there is a social question that must be answered when negotiating anything. I'm glad this was pointed out because if your moral compass is off, your view towards a negotiation will be as well. Great examples with provoking questions and strategy to get results. It's not a how to book, but a "how to think" book.
I had this book as unabridged audio version accompanying me on my commute, and I thought it was great. It tries to identify the success factors behind negotiating in general, without confining this to business and money and using a variety of very interesting case studies.
It makes a lot of sense to me, and has given me a lot think about on how I interact with people I want or need something from or with people who come wanting something from me. So I warmly recommend it.
There were times, proofreading this, when I caught myself thinking, "Have I actually been paying attention to proofreading this, or have I gotten caught up in enjoying reading it?" which I think is a good sign.
Very readable and entertaining, with great anecdotes to illustrate how people other than you have been very clever at negotiating, but I'm not sure I learned anything profound about how to make these techniques work for me in my own life and work. Still, it makes for a useful starting point.
There are some useful techniques and approaches in this book. It is correctly emphasises the unpredictability of the negotiation process. Downside for me is that it lacks systematic approach, in comparison to "Getting to Yes" or similar ones
Li por curiosidade, fazia parte da grade de um amigo.
Explica o passo-a-passo de negociações comerciais e até diplomáticas. Foi interessante como o autor escolheu observar que a negociação tem como intuito promover crescimento, e não "vantagem".
Great and practical book. There are some lists regarding levels of acceptance and tactics I found helpful and the use of anecdotes was particularly useful.