I requested an ARC of this book because I thought it might be useful for my dissertation (for which I will be developing a mindfulness class for graduate students to hopefully reduce their stress levels). I thought this might be a possible reading for the course.
Meh. It's fine, and I'm rounding down from 3.5 stars. It's not something I would adopt for my class, though I would recommend it more broadly to people interested in the topic. This book is part memoir, part how-to guide, part historical overview. It's the part memoir part that I was not expecting, and as such doesn't lend itself to a course reading assignment.
There were things I really liked: the exercises at the end of each chapter seem perfectly feasible and relevant, it's not super "woo woo" to the extent that skeptics would get annoyed by the content of the book, and it's a short, quick read. The overall message of the book was positive and tangible.
Things I didn't like: Some chapters, particularly near the end (I think chapter 7?) started getting a little out there. Some of the chapters also felt like they were written by someone else in terms of the flow of the narrative. Chapter two, for example, read like a high school student wrote it. Every sentence was short and choppy, and for a good portion of the chapter paragraphs started with sentences like "Another example is..." and "A third example is..." etc. But the vast majority was fine. It was just that one chapter that felt out of place, especially coming after an engaging first chapter.
And finally, what is up with books being published recently not having a reference list at the end of the book? There were a few credits, but there were a lot of things missing (namely, I wanted to know what songs/books the Bob Dylan quotes were from, but there wasn't any indication. There were also mentions of research studies throughout the book, but not a single citation. I was willing to overlook the lack of footnotes/in-text citations because of the style of book, but not listing them at the end of the book/not having a "notes" section seems inexcusable to me. If I were the researchers doing the work he referred to, I'd be pissed. (And I am as a reader, because some of the studies were super interesting and I wanted to read them, but he doesn't even give the researcher's name, so I don't know where to start.).
Thanks to Edelweiss+ for the free ARC.