What do you think?
Rate this book
Flint: Its Origin, Properties and Uses.
ts Origin, Properties & Uses
255 pages, Hardcover
First published October 1, 1972
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
September 14, 2025
Walter Shepherd’s Flint: Its Origin, Properties and Uses is not a book that one stumbles upon casually. It belongs to a very particular tradition of writing: half technical manual, half historical compendium, half anthropological reflection. For some, it may appear dry — a survey of geology, fracture patterns, knapping techniques, archaeological sites, and the industrial uses of a single stone. For others, though, it evokes something far deeper. For me, reading it was an experience both intellectual and personal: exactly the kind of book my grandfather would have pressed into my hands, insisting that to understand human history, one must first understand stone. It is a work that operates at the crossroads of nostalgia and knowledge, of technical description and metaphysical resonance. And for that, it earns four stars.
What is flint? In one sense, it is just a cryptocrystalline form of quartz, silica arranged in dense nodules within chalk and limestone deposits. Shepherd spends ample time describing its geological properties, its distribution, its physical behaviour under pressure. But in another sense, flint is nothing less than the ur-material of human technology. Before bronze, before iron, before steel, there was flint. To speak of flint is to speak of the very moment when human beings turned from being mere biological organisms to being tool-users, world-makers, culture-bearers.
This is why Heidegger provides the most illuminating lens. In Being and Time, Heidegger distinguished between objects encountered as “present-at-hand” (things considered abstractly, as if by a scientist) and those encountered as “ready-to-hand” (things used in practice, as tools). Flint is paradigmatically ready-to-hand. The moment an early hominin struck flint against flint, producing a sharp edge, stone ceased to be merely “there” and became a tool, an extension of the body, a medium for cutting, scraping, hunting, surviving. To grasp flint is to grasp the beginning of technology, the beginning of what Heidegger would later call the “enframing” (Gestell) of the world through human making.
Shepherd’s book is, in effect, a genealogy of technology through flint. He charts its uses from the Paleolithic to the early modern period, from hand-axes to gunflints, from prehistoric burials to rural English cottages lined with flint walls. Flint becomes not just an object but a thread running through human history. Reading these sections, I was struck by how flint embodies what material culture theorists call “deep time”: it is a substance that connects geology and archaeology, the earth’s formation and human culture. To hold a flint blade is to hold both a mineral and a history, both a fragment of the earth and a fragment of human becoming.
It is in this sense that the book recalled my readings of Tolkien’s The Silmarillion and Unfinished Tales. Tolkien, in those mythic histories, attempted to create a prehistory for Middle-Earth: cosmogony, genealogy, fragments of stories that explain how the later world came to be. Shepherd, in a more technical and less lyrical way, does the same for our actual world. Flint is our Silmaril, our mythic object, binding us to origins. To read about flint is to read about the First Age of humanity — the time when survival depended on stone and when culture was first inscribed in fractures, flakes, and edges. Tolkien invented Elves and Ainur; Shepherd gives us knappers and miners. But the structural gesture is similar: a descent into origin, into the material and mythical strata that undergird the present.
And yet, Shepherd’s book is not myth but manual. He is meticulous, sometimes even overly so, in describing how flint fractures, how cores are struck, how flakes are detached. This is both the strength and the weakness of the book. For the reader who wants romance, it may feel dry. But for the reader who delights in the concreteness of technical knowledge — who relishes knowing precisely how a stone must be struck at what angle to produce a blade — it is engrossing. Here again Heidegger helps: the tool, when functioning smoothly, disappears into use; it is only when it breaks that we notice it as an object. Shepherd keeps the tool in focus, refusing to let it vanish into invisibility. He insists that we attend to flint as both material and practice.
Where the book falters, and why I withhold the fifth star, is in its prose. Shepherd is clear, but rarely elegant. He is informative, but not lyrical. Compared to writers of material history who can make objects sing — think of Tim Ingold on lines, or Gaston Bachelard on material imagination — Shepherd remains prosaic. The subject deserves, at times, more poetry than he provides. Flint is not only useful; it is beautiful, translucent, sparking when struck. It has a symbolic aura: associated with fire, with weaponry, with the sacred. Shepherd acknowledges this, but does not dwell on it. The book is content to catalogue, when sometimes it ought to linger, to rhapsodise.
But perhaps that is part of its charm. My grandfather’s books — the ones I recall with such fondness — were rarely poetic. They were compendia, manuals, atlases, guides. They did not seduce; they instructed. They assumed that knowledge was itself enchanting, that precision was its own kind of poetry. Reading Shepherd, I felt that same atmosphere. The enchantment lies not in rhetorical flourish but in the quiet insistence that this matters, that to know flint is to know something essential about ourselves.
This raises an interesting psychological dimension. Freud, in Civilization and Its Discontents, argued that the price of civilisation is repression: we surrender instinctual satisfaction in exchange for security. Flint is a counter-example: a material through which instinct and civilisation are reconciled. In striking flint, our ancestors did not repress but express — they transformed raw desire for survival into technical practice, sublimating brute instinct into the art of knapping. Flint thus becomes a kind of primal sublimation: the channeling of aggression into tools, of anxiety into edges. Shepherd does not make this argument, but it haunts his pages nonetheless.
Similarly, if Emerson celebrated self-reliance as the refusal of social conformity, then the first human to strike flint against flint was the first transcendentalist: trusting not in the given order of nature but in the self’s capacity to shape it. Flint thus stands at the intersection of Emerson’s nonconformity and Heidegger’s ready-to-hand, both an act of independence and of world-disclosure.
What makes Shepherd’s book valuable, then, is not just its information but its invitation. It invites the reader to see the world differently: to look at a chalk cliff and imagine the nodules within; to see in a shard of stone not debris but design; to understand that the history of technology is not a march of abstract progress but a succession of materials, each with its affordances and limits. Flint, bronze, iron, steel, silicon: each material opens possibilities and closes others. Shepherd shows us, with admirable patience, how flint inaugurated this sequence.
There is also something political here. In a world saturated with digital technology, it is salutary to remember that our first technology was stone, that our current sophistication is built upon millennia of flaked edges and fractured nodules. To attend to flint is to resist the illusion of immateriality, to recall that even the “cloud” is anchored in mines, minerals, and material histories. Flint reminds us that technology is always material, always grounded, always in some sense geological. Shepherd’s book, though written decades ago, feels newly relevant in an era that risks forgetting this.
And so, four stars. Not five, because the prose is too prosaic, the poetry too absent. But four, because the content is invaluable, the perspective indispensable, the nostalgia undeniable. It is the kind of book one treasures not because it dazzles but because it endures, because it connects one to both ancestors and childhood, to both prehistory and memory.
I finish as I began: thinking of my grandfather, of afternoons leafing through books about minerals, tools, and natural history, books that treated knowledge not as entertainment but as inheritance. Shepherd’s Flint belongs to that tradition. It is not glamorous, but it is brilliant in its own quiet way. Flint cuts, yes, but it also connects — stone to tool, geology to history, memory to imagination.
What is flint? In one sense, it is just a cryptocrystalline form of quartz, silica arranged in dense nodules within chalk and limestone deposits. Shepherd spends ample time describing its geological properties, its distribution, its physical behaviour under pressure. But in another sense, flint is nothing less than the ur-material of human technology. Before bronze, before iron, before steel, there was flint. To speak of flint is to speak of the very moment when human beings turned from being mere biological organisms to being tool-users, world-makers, culture-bearers.
This is why Heidegger provides the most illuminating lens. In Being and Time, Heidegger distinguished between objects encountered as “present-at-hand” (things considered abstractly, as if by a scientist) and those encountered as “ready-to-hand” (things used in practice, as tools). Flint is paradigmatically ready-to-hand. The moment an early hominin struck flint against flint, producing a sharp edge, stone ceased to be merely “there” and became a tool, an extension of the body, a medium for cutting, scraping, hunting, surviving. To grasp flint is to grasp the beginning of technology, the beginning of what Heidegger would later call the “enframing” (Gestell) of the world through human making.
Shepherd’s book is, in effect, a genealogy of technology through flint. He charts its uses from the Paleolithic to the early modern period, from hand-axes to gunflints, from prehistoric burials to rural English cottages lined with flint walls. Flint becomes not just an object but a thread running through human history. Reading these sections, I was struck by how flint embodies what material culture theorists call “deep time”: it is a substance that connects geology and archaeology, the earth’s formation and human culture. To hold a flint blade is to hold both a mineral and a history, both a fragment of the earth and a fragment of human becoming.
It is in this sense that the book recalled my readings of Tolkien’s The Silmarillion and Unfinished Tales. Tolkien, in those mythic histories, attempted to create a prehistory for Middle-Earth: cosmogony, genealogy, fragments of stories that explain how the later world came to be. Shepherd, in a more technical and less lyrical way, does the same for our actual world. Flint is our Silmaril, our mythic object, binding us to origins. To read about flint is to read about the First Age of humanity — the time when survival depended on stone and when culture was first inscribed in fractures, flakes, and edges. Tolkien invented Elves and Ainur; Shepherd gives us knappers and miners. But the structural gesture is similar: a descent into origin, into the material and mythical strata that undergird the present.
And yet, Shepherd’s book is not myth but manual. He is meticulous, sometimes even overly so, in describing how flint fractures, how cores are struck, how flakes are detached. This is both the strength and the weakness of the book. For the reader who wants romance, it may feel dry. But for the reader who delights in the concreteness of technical knowledge — who relishes knowing precisely how a stone must be struck at what angle to produce a blade — it is engrossing. Here again Heidegger helps: the tool, when functioning smoothly, disappears into use; it is only when it breaks that we notice it as an object. Shepherd keeps the tool in focus, refusing to let it vanish into invisibility. He insists that we attend to flint as both material and practice.
Where the book falters, and why I withhold the fifth star, is in its prose. Shepherd is clear, but rarely elegant. He is informative, but not lyrical. Compared to writers of material history who can make objects sing — think of Tim Ingold on lines, or Gaston Bachelard on material imagination — Shepherd remains prosaic. The subject deserves, at times, more poetry than he provides. Flint is not only useful; it is beautiful, translucent, sparking when struck. It has a symbolic aura: associated with fire, with weaponry, with the sacred. Shepherd acknowledges this, but does not dwell on it. The book is content to catalogue, when sometimes it ought to linger, to rhapsodise.
But perhaps that is part of its charm. My grandfather’s books — the ones I recall with such fondness — were rarely poetic. They were compendia, manuals, atlases, guides. They did not seduce; they instructed. They assumed that knowledge was itself enchanting, that precision was its own kind of poetry. Reading Shepherd, I felt that same atmosphere. The enchantment lies not in rhetorical flourish but in the quiet insistence that this matters, that to know flint is to know something essential about ourselves.
This raises an interesting psychological dimension. Freud, in Civilization and Its Discontents, argued that the price of civilisation is repression: we surrender instinctual satisfaction in exchange for security. Flint is a counter-example: a material through which instinct and civilisation are reconciled. In striking flint, our ancestors did not repress but express — they transformed raw desire for survival into technical practice, sublimating brute instinct into the art of knapping. Flint thus becomes a kind of primal sublimation: the channeling of aggression into tools, of anxiety into edges. Shepherd does not make this argument, but it haunts his pages nonetheless.
Similarly, if Emerson celebrated self-reliance as the refusal of social conformity, then the first human to strike flint against flint was the first transcendentalist: trusting not in the given order of nature but in the self’s capacity to shape it. Flint thus stands at the intersection of Emerson’s nonconformity and Heidegger’s ready-to-hand, both an act of independence and of world-disclosure.
What makes Shepherd’s book valuable, then, is not just its information but its invitation. It invites the reader to see the world differently: to look at a chalk cliff and imagine the nodules within; to see in a shard of stone not debris but design; to understand that the history of technology is not a march of abstract progress but a succession of materials, each with its affordances and limits. Flint, bronze, iron, steel, silicon: each material opens possibilities and closes others. Shepherd shows us, with admirable patience, how flint inaugurated this sequence.
There is also something political here. In a world saturated with digital technology, it is salutary to remember that our first technology was stone, that our current sophistication is built upon millennia of flaked edges and fractured nodules. To attend to flint is to resist the illusion of immateriality, to recall that even the “cloud” is anchored in mines, minerals, and material histories. Flint reminds us that technology is always material, always grounded, always in some sense geological. Shepherd’s book, though written decades ago, feels newly relevant in an era that risks forgetting this.
And so, four stars. Not five, because the prose is too prosaic, the poetry too absent. But four, because the content is invaluable, the perspective indispensable, the nostalgia undeniable. It is the kind of book one treasures not because it dazzles but because it endures, because it connects one to both ancestors and childhood, to both prehistory and memory.
I finish as I began: thinking of my grandfather, of afternoons leafing through books about minerals, tools, and natural history, books that treated knowledge not as entertainment but as inheritance. Shepherd’s Flint belongs to that tradition. It is not glamorous, but it is brilliant in its own quiet way. Flint cuts, yes, but it also connects — stone to tool, geology to history, memory to imagination.
Displaying 1 of 1 review