Treating People Well is bland and not particularly useful, but it isn't unpleasant. That's... about the strongest praise I can give it.
I guess I was unclear about the purpose of the book going in. I thought it would be similar to How to Win Friends and Influence People, but more modern. I thought it would have concise ways to be a better person in the internet age. I thought it would also have advice on being more social and throwing the kinds of events the authors did as White House Social Secretaries. And... I guess it sort of approximates those ideas, but in mishmash where the different parts don't stand out from each other.
In the book, the authors explain that they've determined that there are something like twelve different elements of treating people well. Then each chapter investigates those elements. Except for each chapter, the authors also determine that there are three to five important sub-elements of that element. And then there are sub-elements to those sub-elements. I got lost in the vast quantity of topics. Then, even more frustratingly, the topics are really not all that useful. Some of them are really, really obvious, along the lines of "think before you make big decisions" and "try not to lose your temper." The topics can also be really difficult to implement in your life. Early in the book, they talk about having confidence, but not too much confidence that you're cocky. How can you work on getting more confidence? How can you avoid being too cocky? These are tough questions, but it feels like the authors don't really attempt to answer them, nor offer practical tips on how to figure out the answers yourself.
Along with the "tips," the authors tell some stories about their careers working in the White House. These were probably some of the best parts of the book, but I would have preferred less but longer stories with more detail. It's really cool to hear about how the White House functions, but I wanted more of it. And some of the stories wandered into some really vague territory, where the experience wasn't really all that special or clear, which made me think "why am I reading a book by these people?"
One thing really irritated me about their stories, though: there's the sense that the White House is just such a special place that if people don't love it or get annoyed by it, they are these super shitty people. For example, the White House tries to book some really big acts, but they don't have any money to pay these acts and the White House itself isn't exactly a great performing space. Still, a number of the author stories have to do with artists asking for this "crazy" stuff, like special privileges and venue improvements (the author's don't go into too much detail here), and the authors are like "what jerks! They should just be honored to be at the White House!" But, to me, it just felt like the White House people felt entitled to all these special privileges themselves. Another area this popped in was unsatisfactory guests. Many times, the authors complained about guests who were annoyed or distracted when at the White House. These people should feel so special just to be at the White House, right?! Again, I felt like the authors should have come down off of their high horses.
Despite my gripes, though, I found the general message about trying to be nice to people to shine through. The authors themselves come across as super nice. It makes me feel kind of bad writing this mostly negative review (but I'm trying to be honest!). As I read, I genuinely liked the people I was reading about, which is kind of a rare experience.
But I wouldn't recommend this book. I think it's mostly fluff, without useful information or particularly engaging stories.