Well, the positive thing about the story is thay it's really catching, you need to know what happens in the end no matter how dull and boring the conversation is! That's the only good thing writer is good about, general storytelling, when it comes to conversations and dialogs, writer immensely failed with this part.
Overall, the second half of the book is more interesting than the first, perhaps cause it's more of storytelling which is the writer's main strength. The extra dialogs in the first half make you completely lose interest in the book.
Punctuation is extremely poor, not sure if this is the writer's or the editor's issue, however it poorly affected the overall value of the book.
Writer tried to mix some facts with the fictional part of the book on which conclusion was not the best.
The main issue in the book- in my very own point of view-- is similar to a lot of other reviews, the writer keeps repeating the same words, sentences and perhaps full dialogs over and over again every few pages, which gives the very impression that writer was not in command of language, ideas, concepts or main storyline. Further pages were added to the book for no reason I'd say.
My first book to read for this writer, and it was not the best example I have to say. Perhaps further efforts were made in other books? We'll see.
S.