Unfortunately this book is not based on the true facts, as I have checked on purpose the letter contents given in this book with the original ones. None of the original letters contain the word which is given in the book.
For example: “Do you remember our old nurse a Zundert, Leen Veerman?” he asked Theo. “If my memory does not deceive me, Sien is that kind of person.” [Letter 201]
This is a l i e. There is no Sien in the letter numbered 201.
This book is dated. There are mentions of letters that eventually changed numbers as more letters were found and added as well as one of the Bedrooms at the time of this book being written that hung in the Louvre that is no longer there. I for one don’t quite see this as the book I hoped for when I read the description. Although the author shows multiple different possibilities that could have made Vincent the way he was, no matter what the main idea is it always comes with a religious base. In art history, we only touched that with ‘Oh he was a religious man before he started painting’ and that is it. I had never seen any of his paintings with a religious idea or affiliation/hidden symbols, besides the ones he copied the originals of earlier artist that were religious paintings. Also, I never saw Vincent with any sort of homosexual intention or thought. Reading other books about him, I would have never thought that one of his frustrations could have been for his conflicting feelings of possible homosexual intent. He never really came across as that, and with myself understanding the struggles of being apart of the LGBTQ+ Community, I would have never guess he may have been queer. His love and longing to be married and have children just seems way to strong for him...plus he only admired Gauguin as the artist he was, not as the person (Gauguin was often incredibly rude to Vincent and Vincent’s style of art). I love Van Gogh and his artwork and will always admire him as one of my favorite artists of all time. Although there are some ideas I downright disagree with what is put forth by this author, it was still an interesting read.
Excellent biography which provided the counterpoint for much of my reading of Derek Fell's. Interesting and thorough in its considerations of the art and actions of Van Gogh it provided a suitable analysis of the complexities of the man that was Vincent Van Gogh. The organizing structure however, being non-chronological did at first provide me with some difficulty as I wasn't fully familiar with all of the periods of work for Van Gogh as well as the phases of his life.