What do you think?
Rate this book
Higher Laws from Beyond the Veil: Insights about the true nature of God, prayer and the laws that govern all interactions on earth
There are higher laws that govern interactions here on earth. This book is about the lessons learned though a Near Death Experience (NDE). The higher law of “eye for an eye” is “love your enemies”. Higher than that is “have no enemies.” Higher than that is “what’s an enemy?” There will always be higher laws for eternally evolving beings. Higher Laws from Beyond the Veil, will demonstrate the true nature of God, the laws that God must follow, and how and why everything comes into and out of one's life experience. This book outlines in detail how to work within the laws instead of asking God to change the unchangeable. Have you ever • Why God was wrathful & angry in the Old Testament & unconditionally loving in the New? • How God is not angry, upset or disappointed when we sin • How God is not the provider or withholder anything from anyone • True purpose of our emotions and how it relates God • Why “bad” things happen to “good” people • How to get rid things that you do not want • How to best pray and harmonize with what you want • Why most prayers are ineffectual to counterproductive
135 pages, Kindle Edition
Published February 6, 2018
2 people are currently reading
1 person want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
December 5, 2019
Prepare for a complete foundational earthquake. The good kind.
The book starts with talking about the foundation of the personality about God, it tears down the scriptural versions and adds to the different scriptural versions. Thought his NDE he sorted them all out into a clearer picture. It points out how in the BOM it separates between Heavenly Father - the being & “The laws”, how they are different and should be treated as such. Never saw it that way. (The only proper rebuttal to “The Problem of Evil” I have ever read is in here as well.) He builds a new foundation take that makes sense, and then he teaches how to build on top of that.
It does not seem like it should be, but it’s hard doctrine that made me uneasy at first, but the longer I thought about it, the more sense it made. I just started thinking about some of my old viewpoints and they don’t match up in the light of this new perspective.
He is very, very, very persuasive. I don’t know if that’s because he has truth on his side, or he is just very good at placing a doctrinal statement and supporting it from multiple angles. Tearing down things that are unsupportable and don’t make sense is uncomfortable to me because I can’t find room in my brain for any other logical viewpoint. What he says is clear and pure. But this shakes the entire structure of the church, so, so much stuff crumbles away. And maybe parts of the church do need to fall away as there are lots of bad-tasting fruits and too many members living in guilt and shame. Lots of prescription drug abuse that I witness every day. He calls them void fillers classifying actions as distractions or addictions. Because there is a hole inside people because the doctrine taught isn’t as full as it could be. This isn’t really new doctrine, it’s just more full. It’s just more. It just cuts away the bitter parts and really emphasizes the core aspects Jesus taught.
The book starts with talking about the foundation of the personality about God, it tears down the scriptural versions and adds to the different scriptural versions. Thought his NDE he sorted them all out into a clearer picture. It points out how in the BOM it separates between Heavenly Father - the being & “The laws”, how they are different and should be treated as such. Never saw it that way. (The only proper rebuttal to “The Problem of Evil” I have ever read is in here as well.) He builds a new foundation take that makes sense, and then he teaches how to build on top of that.
It does not seem like it should be, but it’s hard doctrine that made me uneasy at first, but the longer I thought about it, the more sense it made. I just started thinking about some of my old viewpoints and they don’t match up in the light of this new perspective.
He is very, very, very persuasive. I don’t know if that’s because he has truth on his side, or he is just very good at placing a doctrinal statement and supporting it from multiple angles. Tearing down things that are unsupportable and don’t make sense is uncomfortable to me because I can’t find room in my brain for any other logical viewpoint. What he says is clear and pure. But this shakes the entire structure of the church, so, so much stuff crumbles away. And maybe parts of the church do need to fall away as there are lots of bad-tasting fruits and too many members living in guilt and shame. Lots of prescription drug abuse that I witness every day. He calls them void fillers classifying actions as distractions or addictions. Because there is a hole inside people because the doctrine taught isn’t as full as it could be. This isn’t really new doctrine, it’s just more full. It’s just more. It just cuts away the bitter parts and really emphasizes the core aspects Jesus taught.
Displaying 1 of 1 review