***I received an audio ARC of this book from NetGalley in exchange for an honest review***
The Multi-Hyphen Life (formally the Multi-Hyphen Method) is a career/self-help book that looks at the complexities and benefits of a career with multiple facets and income streams. i.e. having multiple jobs. I listened to the audiobook, which is read by the author.
The book attempts to be a career guide, a self-help book, and a run-down of contemporary labour. It does some of these things better than others. I read many reviews after finishing the book that expressed some frustration. I think the frustration many readers felt was because they were looking for a book on one of these topics, and not all three. I enjoyed all three topics, but I did feel that all of them could have been explored more in-depth.
I'll start with the self-help parts of the book, mostly the early chapters.
I do feel like I needed to read this book or at least some parts of it. I've been very hung up on my inability to find a full-time job for most of the past year. It's good to remember that many people my age (and older) have fulfilling careers despite not have full-time jobs. However, it is awful that full-time jobs with benefits have become so rare.
I've been panicking about the possibility of having to continue to cobble together many different income streams (as opposed to getting a single full-time job) post PhD. While the lack of stability sucks (especially when thinking about mortgages etc.), this book examines some positives. It is easy to feel like a failure when you can't get any interviews for full-time work; this book at least made me feel a bit better about all of that.
It is discouraging to pay so much for your education and then only secure part-time work without benefits. It is hard to tell how much of that discouragement is cultural and how much of it is personal. The MHM dives into the shame, and the discouragement people feel surrounding work. I think it does this very well. The best thing about this book is that it attempts to help you understand that it's okay to make the best of a bad situation. And our labour market currently is very, very, very, very bad.
As a self-help book, this book helps the reader confront the shame they feel around work (and overwork) and acknowledges that it is not the worker's fault. This is important. I think the MHM succeeds in this regard.
As a career guide, I don't think it fully succeeds in its goals. It could benefit from a lot more specifics. How are these people making money? Not "with a podcast," but literally, how does the podcast make money?
These specifics could be from the many interesting people she very briefly interviewed or from the author herself. There is a disconnect happening where you have: "these people are successful here is what they do", but not "and here is how someone like you can do it."
The author clarifies that the book is *not* a how-to guide to becoming an influencer, but it needs to be a how-to of something! Otherwise, it isn't telling the reader (a millennial or Gen Z reader at least) anything they don't already know. It isn't doing anything to demystify these new types of work.
"Multi-hyphenates" Self-employed people, influencers, podcasters, writers, they make money, but how? The book gives a lot of advice that most people have heard before but stops short of getting specific enough to tell you things you don't know.
The most useful stuff is when she mentions specific tools/services she uses. She doesn't do this often, but when she does, it is great.
In Chapter 10, the author briefly explains how to monetize these various side hustles (affiliate links etc.), but it is really a very short list that doesn't detail how these things work. It really could be a blog post. I think Chapter 10 could have been fleshed out into multiple chapters, and it would have improved this book a great deal.
Lastly, this is a book about the changing nature of work. This is the book's portion that I am the most qualified to talk about, and I have read about this topic in great depth.
As a Marxist, I was a bit worried that this book might make me mad, but it didn't. Gannon acknowledges the horrendous state of the economy, and this book was written *before* the current recession. She acknowledges how the gig economy takes advantage of people. For the most part, she does not valorize the capitalist crisis.
Ganon points out many flaws in late-capitalism and office-work culture. Unfortunately, she stops short of actually pointing out the root of the problem. It's presented more as "this is how it is, and it all sucks, so why not opt-out of it?" I understand that saying "the problem is capitalism" is probably not something an editor would let you do when you are attempting to write a book for a very large audience. But because of this, the discussions of inequality and labour feel a bit toothless.
This would be a great book for Bosses and CEOs to read to learn about the challenges employee face, but sadly I don't think that's who is reading this book. Because workers are reading the book, they are well aware that work is literally making them sick. But, at the end of the day, they are not the people who could do something about these problems. Other than by organizing, which I will return to in a second.
While Gannon does a great job of outlining what's wrong with work, she also forwards a "do what you love" mentality that I feel is incompatible. While she is much more pragmatic about that mentality than most people, it still contradicts much of what she says. Even someone living the dream can struggle with all these issues as well.
A lot of these problems discussed can't be solved by "multi-hyphen life" They can only be solved by unions, better health care, better housing, better government, better social programs, etc. This book could be a fantastic argument for why everyone needs a union, but that's not the argument it is advancing.
I wish passion, flexibility, and side hustles were the cure for burnout and unstable work, but they aren't. If they were, academia and journalism would be much better places to work!
Lastly, while the audiobook was very well read by the author, I would pick the text version over audio. The book has many short sections with headings etc., and it would be better to read it traditionally if you are able.
I really think Gannon is very talented, and this book had the potential to be one of three great books, but instead, it was a surface examination of three topics/approaches. I do think that many people could still get a lot out of this book, especially if you know what you are getting going into it, so I would still recommend it to the right person at the right time.