La Fanfarlo follows themes of curiosity, love beauty and cynicism. It is well-known and quite obvious that the poetic dandy of a protagonist, Samuel Cramer, is, at the very least, modeled after Baudelaire and possibly an autobiographical roman-a-clef character. The novella itself faithfully follows the prosaic footsteps of Honoré de Balzac while splicing Baudelairean ideas on aesthetics and loyalties to the virtue of beauty.
The novella begins by describing the young, complex and compelling Samuel Cramer. Monsuier Cramer was both lazy and enterprising with the moxie of fine geniuses with naive effrontery. Yet, he had the arrogance to identify with or claim the works of good writers he admired! Still, he was good-hearted, gentle, dapper, romantic, faithful turned atheist, learned, curious and, perhaps, bi-curious. Near Lyon, Cramer meets and befriends a distraught reader and wife named Mme. de Cosmelly. She bemoans her husband's affair with a dancer known as La Fanfarlo ("The Braggart" or "The Flaunter"). Cramer vows to act as a sort of beard and romantic usurper by luring away La Fanfarlo from de Cosmelly's husband despite his lack of authentic feelings for the mistress. Not surprisingly, the romantic and sensitive poet falls for the beautiful dancer who performed as columbine in a vast pantomime and bonded with Samuel Cramer through truffles, conversing and making love. But for how long can Cramer feed his appetite for beauty by seeing La Fanfarlo? Will the ploy behind this concubinage work and rekindle de Cosmelly's relationship? How will the spirited La Fanfarlo react to this union's basis on a scandalous scheme?
This is a riveting, extravagant and energetic tale of a poetic man with noble genius, idleness, meretriciousness and a quixotic reality as he faces a near-tragic end. Cramer is met with bitter poetic justice; his status becomes a mirror to his sins. It is easy to use La Fanfarlo as a study on Baudelaire's life with Mme de Cosmelly as analogous to his sister-in-law Félicité and La Fanfarlo to Jeanne Duval. It is Samuel Cramer as a sosie of Baudelaire himself, however, that provides the most intrigue for readers. Using a good dose of gentle self-parody throughout the novella, Samuel Cramer not only holds Baudelaire's flaws and vices but also demonstrates the near cursed ill-fate for the paradoxical man. The 1986 translation and introduction by Greg Boyd are excellent and accessible for reader. Occasional footnotes define terms that may be obscure or out-of-reach for English language readers. While this is not Baudelaire's finest work nor a milestone in the Romantic tradition, this novella is a gem for readers.