I really struggle to rate this book. It gave me A LOT of food for thought, challenged me and gave me instantly applicable ways to work on my marriage. However, I had a difficult time with the author's view on divorce and separation and thought some of his advice was more pragmatic and secular (leaning on psychology) than Biblical. I'm still processing the information and I believe Gary Thomas is writing from years of experience; I think this contributes to a more practical, realist approach than the sometimes spiritualized, idealistic approach of people who haven't seen some really hard situations. The question is: should incredibly difficult situations alter what we see as clear teaching from scripture? Should we leave room for special cases?
The author is very careful to explain that he is an advocate for marriage and to show that divorce is not an easy out. However, some of the way he talked about divorce/separation concerned me. He wrote that separation is appropriate in some situations (in order for men to feel the consequences of their actions and for women to develop their own strength) and that "it's not a sin to need a vacation if your marriage is driving you crazy." In some particularly difficult times in my own marriage, I think this sort of advice would have helped me justify separation which I believe could have been incredibly damaging to our marriage.
In the case of adultery (or unrepentant, continuous pornography) and abuse, Thomas argues that divorce is legitimate. He writes, "God is against divorce in most cases, but he's equally against marriages that are sucking the lives out of women that are married to spiritually sick men." In another chapter he says, "If the cost of saving a marriage is destroying a woman, the cost is too high. God loves people more than he loves institutions, even institutions he created...I will never defend a marriage above the emotional, spiritual and physical health of a woman." He draws a parallel between this and Christ's teaching that the sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath. This is a new thought for me, but also a concerning one. How can we tell when the cost is too high? When we're hurting it feels too high NOW. How can we tell if our spouse is too "spiritually sick" to stay in the marriage? Aren't we all spiritually sick to some degree? We don't know how or when God will change our spouse's heart or how he will use our difficulties in our own lives. Yet, knowing the types of situations that happen in real life, can I really condemn the author's reasoning that divorce is sometimes the answer? I am pretty against divorce, both as a child of divorced parents and as someone who has struggled much in my own marriage. Without an unwavering commitment to staying married, I wonder how many people will look for any justification to exit their marriage and possibly miss out on what God was trying to do in their lives. This book, although highlighting examples of couples who did adamantly reject divorce outright, troubled me in this area and I would be reluctant to recommend it because of it. It is helpful, though, that Thomas encourages the reader to determine their views of what the Bible says about this matter before taking any action.
I also thought some of the material was too pragmatic. For example, the author talks about "functional fixedness," the idea that men need to feel the consequences for themselves before being willing to change because they don't have empathy for the consequences that their spouse feels. He writes that if you can't compel him to be more responsible with money, or fulfill his responsibilities around the house you should refuse to eat out with him or accept that the house doesn't get clean if he doesn't do his share of the house work, allowing him to be impacted by his choices (which he distinguishes from punishing him). This advice could conflict with the complementarian view of marriage and could also push a marriage into the realm of roommates - each responsible for their own part, but not working together as a whole.
Speaking of complementarianism, the author describes both that and egalitarianism. Though he seems to favor complementarianism (and says that he own marriage resembles that model) he writes that most of the material works for both egalitarian and complementarian marriages. He compliments egalitarianism for the call for women to fulfill their responsibilities and not be passive but also says the Bible clearly calls wives to some form of submission. Encouraging the reader to consult the Bible about this topic, he writes that "regardless of which view you adopt on marital roles, Moses in Genesis and the apostle Paul in his writings are both quite explicit that the wife embrace the spiritually powerful position of being her husband's helper."
Thomas presents lots of research about the biological differences in the male brain, but he is careful to not excuse bad behavior on the grounds of any sort of inherent disposition. I appreciated this material (like learning that men are, on average, seven hours behind women in their processing of emotionally charged material) and it helps make sense of situations we experience regularly. The author tries hard to help women understand that men do not think like women and you can tell that his heart is for couples to understand each other, be gracious in differences (without excusing sin) and learn from the strengths that God gave to each. He writes that we see in Christ the perfect balance of the strengths of male and female brains. We need to learn from and appreciate each, and children need to be raised under the influence of both. I'm really thankful for how the author gives material to challenge wives about how to appreciate and understand their husband's differences and still holds men accountable for their individual choices. It was interesting and helpful to hear from a man's perspective about the topics covered.
One of my final concerns is that, even with my background in psychology, I have grown increasingly leery of it and there are a couple times that Thomas' arguments feel overly psychological or biological. At the same time, I have to acknowledge that God does give us insight into how our brains and bodies work and it would be foolish to ignore how these parts of our beings influence us.
Those are my concerns and are things that I am still thinking through, but that would keep me from whole-heartedly recommending the book. Now for the concepts that really encouraged/challenged me:
1. You can change the equation of your marriage by remodeling yourself. A + B = C (even if one is constant, if you change the other you can change the outcome).
2. Marriage isn't primarily fueled by the love you give to your husband, it's primarily fueled by the love you receive from God. "Whenever your husband breaks your heart, let God fill it. Before you try anything else, even before you seek resolution, learn to run into the amazing, affirming, understanding refuge that is God. Allow the puzzle of loving an imperfect man to push you into a fulfilling partnership with the God who loves you and loves your husband and who will work with you in any holy endeavor."
3. Transform the focus of your expectations from what you expect of your husband to what your God expects of you. "Respond to temptations to judge your husband, by praying to God to change you. Go into prayer armed with two lists: your husband's strengths and your own weaknesses."
4. "Your job as a wife is to stay sensitive to your husband's strengths. Resist the temptation to compare his weaknesses to another husband's strengths while forgetting your husband's strengths and somebody else's husband's weaknesses. Don't resent your husband for being less than perfect. He can't be anything else."
5. "Harmony, joy, and peace will never grace a home ruled by expectations instead of by the cross."
6. Your husband is not the church. God called us into community. There's no way that your husband can (or should be expected to) meet all of your needs. Seek other members of the body (same sex) with whom to pray, study, run, etc.
7. If it's good for him, it's good for us.
There is really helpful material about anger that I appreciated. He encourages women to not blame themselves for their husbands' anger writing that it's impossible to live with an angry man without making him angry. However, he reasons that it's inevitable that spouses will be angry with each other at times. He writes, if you ask him to never be angry you'll confuse him, because asking him to never feel anger is like asking you never to feel hurt. Both are the result of two sinners living together. He clarifies that anger as a feeling becomes a sinful expression when it scares, threatens or hurts. It is also sinful when it pressures someone to give in, or keeps them from expressing their own feelings. He challenges women in their response to their husband's sinful anger writing that you must work to stay humble in your opposition of pride. Just because someone I'm opposing is wrong, doesn't mean I'm right. There are a million ways to miss a target, and only one way to hit it.
There's quite a bit of material about sexuality (both the necessity of it in marriage and the perversion of it) that was challenging and helpful, though I don't necessarily agree with his perspective with everything.
Overall, I was really challenged by this book. It gave me a lot of compassion for my husband, for the unique struggles that may impact men differently than women and for the needs that he has. It made me think seriously about loving him well and put Luke 6:32 ("If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners love those who love them.") in the context of marriage. Even a unbeliever can love a husband who is thoughtful, attentive, handy, and so on. Christian wives are called to love their imperfect husbands and so imitate God's love for us. It convicted me of my sinful attitudes, expectations and behaviors and gave lots of very practical help for working on myself, encouraging my husband and glorifying God in our marriage. I would recommend this to mature believers with a caveat about the concerns mentioned above. I would enjoy the opportunity to go through this book with a mature friend who could help me Biblically process the things I was unsure about and hold me accountable to work through the many areas covered. I will definitely re-read it.
I love Gary Thomas' audiobooks because he reads them himself and I think I get so much more out of them by listening. He's a fast reader and he is very expressive and warm - it almost feels like a counseling session. I only miss being able to easily reference the text for further study/follow up.