Whew child. How can Dufresne take up so much textual real estate and say so little? How, Sway?
In the first few chapters, a lot of time is spent pontificating on the history of flash fiction and myths and reciting Oxford English Dictionary definitions. Yawn.
And the quotes. Good lord, the quotes. The text is saturated with them. The worst are pull quotes -- like the kind you'd see in a magazine, which makes for a jarring reading experience.
Speaking of quotes, Dufresne often neglects to contextualize them. I guess he thought they could speak for themselves? He relies so heavily on the input of others that I found his own insights lacking. Quotes should be used to support your own ideas not supplant them.
I think the thing I'm most salty about is his discussion of craft and technique... or the lack there of. Most of it was rudimentary, at best, and nothing you haven't seen before. Sure, there were exercises sprinkled throughout, but they were tantamount to "Okay, now write some flash fiction." Like, what?
If you want a more thorough and thoughtful discussion of flash fiction, there is a wealth of information on the internet.
All that aside, the book is a quick read, and I appreciate the collection of flash stories the book includes. You get a feel for the possibilities available to flash authors. The actual stories were great, it's just the junk bracketing them that I had a hard time with.
If you feel the need to read this book, (though I'm not sure why you'd want to), save your coins and borrow it from your local library.