Ceterius Paribus...... All other things being equal except the presence of this book during Nehru's or TTKs time probably we would not have been a socialistic country or atleast there would have been some attempt towards free market initiatives.
There is a joke which goes like, how many economists does it take to change a light bulb?
There is also this practical joke, how many economists does it take to screw a country? In our case a couple of them, including our bhoothpoorva chacha ji who thought himself to be a jack of many trades.
This book by an IIM-A prof delves into price theory, competition, market structures with a lot of small but different case studies. This book is divided into 10 chapters which starts off from the basic demand and supply to price ceiling, MSP, rent control act etc etc
The most important attribute of this book is its simplicity in teaching concepts that we come across everyday but not sure whom to ask. You can say google, but there is too much of info there.
Some concepts or questions that were answered
A. Consumer & producers surplus: What does it mean to have a surplus? Who gets benefitted? etc
B. The price and quantity graph, why is the price on the X axis and why not on the Y axis.
C. Why is monopoly bad, which is explained in a mathematical and a logical manner. Even communists would tend to agree.
D. Why should the government not get embroiled where private sector could have done wonders.
E. Why socialism and communism are totally bad for any countries health.
I like the book for the following points
A. The book explained a lot of concepts in a simple manner.
B. The design of the book was pleasant and readable.
C. The small case studies were a joy to read and were taken from an Indian point of view.
D. This will help in demystifying economics to a decent extent.
Some improvements that are required, which i felt
A. The formulae used could have been more simplified. e.g. Pm and Qm are equilibrium price and quantity. Couldn't something simpler be used? or dSR1 shifting of perceived demand? Why oh why make it so complicated professor.
B. There are a lot of graphs in the book, but the explanation and the graphs were in different pages. This makes a huge difference.
C. The explanations were not easy in places. e.g. "If the LRAC is U-shaped, we know for sure that the long-run marginal cost curve(LRMC) must be below LRAC when LRAC is decreasing and above LRAC when LRAC is increasing" I kid you not, this has been taken from the book.
D. The explanations could have been much more simple with more case studies and good infographics.
I would recommend that a second edition be released with these additions and corrections. The book is good and it should become excellent which it can.
I sincerely thank Random house for giving me the opportunity to review the book.
My rating 3.5 stars out of 5