Taking place in London, Ghost Song focuses on the Tarleton, an old music hall that closed in 1914 and has remained unopened for almost a hundred years due to a clause in the last owner’s will stating that the theater should not be opened for at least 50 years after his death.
Robert, a surveyor hired to inspect the theater, and Hilary, who works for the Harlequin—an Historical Preservation society that maintains the Tarleton—are both drawn in to the theater’s history when Robert makes an interesting discovery in the cellars—a hastily constructed brick wall erected in such a way as to cut off most of the under-stage area. Determined to find out what’s behind the wall, both Robert and Hilary start sleuthing, and begin uncovering information that seems to raise more questions than it answers, especially the most important question of all: Who, or what, is the Tarleton ghost?
The book flips back and forth between the present day, and 1914 when the theater was in its heyday.
I thought Ghost Song was a decent read in that it had good pacing, and enough characters to make a good, "final reveal," but it's definitely not a "creepy" sort of ghost story, and the below three points are the reason for my two-star review:
Point 1: Dialogue
Some authors write great dialogue, and some do better with scenes. Rayne is definitely one of the latter. In fact, I came thisclose to putting the book away altogether after the third chapter because the dialogue was painful to read. If you ever heard two people talking the way Robert and Hilary do on their first meeting, you’d worry that there was something medically wrong with them. Stiff, awkward, and obvious doesn’t even begin to describe how stilted Rayne’s dialogue can get, so if you pick this book up, just beware. It wasn’t until Chapter seven, when Rayne launches into Shona’s backstory, that I really started to get into the book. When there’s not a lot of dialogue, Rayne definitely shines, but when there is…just try to find something to bite down on and muscle your way through it.
Point 2: The Revenge Scheme
I found the entire construct of Anton’s scheme to discredit Toby in order to hurt his parents to be waaaaaaay too ephemeral to stand as an actual revenge plot. From the very beginning, the entire plan to have Toby travel to Austria in order to be on-site at the assassination of the Archduke, is based entirely on a set of coincidental occurrences, with nothing even resembling intent. In fact, the only reason Toby does end up going, is due to Sonia, who isn't even aware of Anton's plan. It simply makes no sense for Anton to have spent the last 30 years planning his revenge, only to leave it up to casual happenstance.
To put it another way, Anton's plan would be like if you spent 30 years crafting a revenge scheme that consisted of waiting for your victim to move to California, where they MIGHT die in an earthquake.
Point 3: The Cellar Wall
The cellar wall really bugged me, and here’s the reason: Why did they brick up fully half of the cellars? I feel like it would have made much more sense to move poor Rinaldi’s body into some corner, and then build a wall around it there, where more than likely, it would never be noticed.
Instead, they build this HUGE wall that not only cuts right through the cellar, but also necessitates that the entrance to the stage trap be sealed off. I feel like taking this approach basically guarantees that someone is going to start poking around, and, in fact, that’s exactly what happens. Basically they left Rinaldi's body where it fell, and built the wall around him instead of moving him, which would have made SO MUCH MORE SENSE. Seriously. The inefficiency of this move baffles me to no end.
In the end, the book's not bad, but there's definitely parts of it that could use some shoring up.