I love a good conspiracy. Some are better than others. Redfern is a prolific, talked about, and interviewed a lot within the conspiracy circle. SO I thought it was about time to I delved into one of his books.
I found it entertaining for most of the time, even interesting. There wasn't much in here that I haven't heard of before, no really new evidence that I haven't seen. Alien abductees are an interesting subject. One that has a lot of complexities to it. Whether or not you believe the experience actually happened to them or not. The psychological damage is well documented and real. Furthermore, the change it has on their life is undeniable.
For me he dropped down to 2 star when he got into the microchipping subject.
I am so exhausted of the "microchipping is EVIL" message. Do companies and the government take advantage of your data? No Sh**. Instead of taking this into consideration and focusing on how to move forward with a massively LIFE SAVING technology, the author opted for the more juvenile approach of "OMG I'm scared of this, therefore it has to be EVIL".
As we move forward with some of the more advanced technology that is now about to come into public use, we as a society NEED to be attuned to what the technology is and what kind of restrictions and policies need to be put in place. We failed to do that with smartphones and the internet, the cost of that has been our data privacy being thrown out the window. Just because something can be used for a terrible purpose doesn't mean it shouldn't be explored or used. I mean you still use the internet, it has still been massively beneficial to humanity. The list can go on here: automobiles, guns, fire. All have been used by terrible people to do terrible things, yet we have found ways to use them and work to reduce the bad.
Instead of a blanket "bad" label being put on microchipping, why not talk about the concerns and the good it can bring then add suggestions on how to use it ethically. But no, we see the easy way of simply vilifying the entire subject was taken instead.
One a less frustrating note, the subject of a new world order or world government was brought up again. And this general consensus that this is an evil and terrible thing confounds me. We live in a day and age where we ARE a global society with global issues. Climate change being the largest one that comes to mind, but what about human trafficking and other international crimes. The idea of uniting and not having to worry about going into another world war sounds pretty good to me. I am not saying that there wouldn't be concerns and major obstacles. But once again I don't think an entire idea should be written off as "evil" without considering the positive outcomes it could bring and discussing on whether there is a good, safe way to implement it.
The world isn't black and white kids. And just because an idea is "scary" or disruptive in nature doesn't automatically bad or evil.