What do you think?
Rate this book


374 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2006
Wow. This book was really turned my brain into mush. Honestly, I don't know what to even think about certain things anymore.
I really liked the intro to the book which surprised me a lot. And this book isn't my typical read exactly. Instead of being about history, it's about how the way looking at history with bias has changed history throughout history. I know. Super confusing, but it's hard to explain.
The author, a history professor, wrote this book to get a couple of messages across.
Since textbooks aren't primary sources, they're not the most trustable historical sources out there. Firsthand accounts will very likely be more accurate than something written by a publishing company hundreds of years later.
But even when you get down to the original source, it's still fuzzy. How much of it is really true, and how much of it was written down to make a person/group/event look good? After all, they're human, so it would make sense that they might not have had the best or honest of motives.
Despite what lots of people believe, history can be sometimes the most confusing subject. It--in my opinion--has the more gray area than anything else learned in school. History is a lot of times based upon opinion and perception. As time continues, the reality of what actually has happened becomes distorted and certain parts are taken out of the story due to benefit people in someway (i.e. politics).
So, it's super important to read from multiple sources (that means the not-as-new ones too). This makes me wonder though. Out of all the history books and sources I've read, and all of what is said at museums and historical sites, what information is really true?😮