Having begun his literary career in his five-year stay in England and even modeling his portrayal of Beiping from Charles Dickens’ novels, Lao She achieves a literary feat in “Camel Xiangzi” where the Chinese novel features an authentic Chinese character which seems to be relatable even with Western readers as the prose has limited third person point of view and even Aritotelian unities, and where the main character, Xiangzi, is an embodiment of a very Western ideology, individualism. However, the social realism in the novel “Camel Xiangzi” is evident and palpable in the author’s gripping study of the lives of the poor, working class and the failure of individualism when juxtaposed with the Chinese culture and community. In the harsh words of the author himself in Chapter Thirteen, describing and foreshadowing the fate of the titular protagonist, “respectability, ambition, loyalty, and integrity had failed him. Why? Because he led a dog’s life.” While the novel defends and criticizes Xiangzi by bestowing upon him a most miserable life, the recipient of Lao She’s sharp attack is the society which reduced Xiangzi to the camel that he has become.
Without question, Xiangzi is among the most pitiful literary characters ever written. Despite being blessed with natural gifts and positive attributes, his youth and his strength, his determination and integrity, Xiangzi is defenseless as the society hurls him into a downward spiral path just because he is a member of the lowest class in his society, uneducated and alone, with no family or any permanent ties to another member of the community. If Xiangzi were a character in a Western work of fiction, more specifically American literature, he would probably be viewed as an outcast or unwilling hero who will eventually face challenges and become master of his own fate, triumphing over enemies or personal crises, and eventually, probably, dying or transcending his self in the end, inspiring other people. Unfortunately, Xiangzi is a Chinese character. Lao She explained at one part of the novel that Xiangzi’s ill-gotten luck is due to his being in the wrong place and at the wrong time. This is definitely the tragedy that doomed Xiangzi’s fate. Being an individualist, a man who works hard to get money for himself, the way his goal has always been directed towards himself, whether he’s saving up for a new rickshaw or avoiding having anything to do with his abominable wife Huniu, Xiangzi’s self-serving ways are frowned upon by the Chinese society who regards communal or social welfare as the most important goal which every person or Chinese citizen should strive for. His motivations, which eventually became his attachments:the first rickshaw that he bought, the money he obtained from selling the camels, his affection for Fuzi and admiration for Mr. Cao: all of these, while giving him a sense of security, led him to his downfall. Lao She’s sadistic plots might seem too harsh for some readers who might cry foul over his unmerciful plot devices, such as Xiangzi’s encounter with the spy hunting Mr Cao or his unfortunate wedding with Huniu, but these events all support the message that the author tries to impress upon the readers: the likes of Xiangzi can never succeed in a Chinese community because he is the antithesis of Confucian philosophy and values. But this does not necessarily mean the Lao She promotes Taoism either: otherwise why would Xiangzi of the last few chapters, while having abandoned everything and all the rules of the society, can still be seen as a tragic figure who is reduced to nothing more than an animal?
Arguably, the success of Xiangzi, though not very evident, is his unwavering spirit that just lives on. In Chapter Twenty-Two, Lao She writes, “The soldiers who’d seized his rickshaw; Mrs. Yang, who’d withheld food from her servants; Huniu, who’d deceived and oppressed him; Fourth Master, who’d been contemptuous of him; Detective Sun, who’d swindled him out of his money; Granny Chen, who’d made a fool of him; Mrs. Xia, who’d tried to seduce him... They would die, all of them, while faithful, honest Xiangzi would live on forever!” While Xiangzi is arguably the victor in this strange tale of a man’s downfall, the cause of his undoing lies heavily on the society. The discrimination is obviously seen in the first chapter where the discussion of the classes of rickshaw pullers were categorized; this means that even in the lowest rungs of the society, people still marginalize other people. When Fourth Master celebrates his birthday and entertains the idea how repulsive it would be to have Xiangzi as a foster son or a son-in-law because of his low class, he does so because the society has dictated upon him that a man can be judged according to his class. In Xiangzi’s society, it is unfortunate that the social class is a more reliable basis in judging another person than his natural strengths, talents and abilities. And while the Taoist way of life can also be seen as the better alternative, the society frowns upon these rebels and regards the Taoist proponents as outcasts and degenerates as also seen in the character of Ruan Ming and the “respectable, ambitious, self-serving, individualistic, robust, and mighty Xiangzi” who has become a “degenerate, selfish, and hapless product of a sick society.”
Perhaps, this is one of Lao She’s thrusts in writing the novel: by exposing how the so-called traditional virtues or values of the Chinese, both Confucian and Taoist, can still contribute to the degradation of human integrity through the piteous events that happened in Xiangzi’s life, the Chinese or perhaps any society should continuously question the relevance of these so-called time-tested, rich, cultural social virtues and traditions in the advancing modern world. Do these values and traditions still make us more human or do they reduce us to nothing more than emotionless, unthinking beasts?