In this lively book, Janice M. Irvine offers not only the first comprehensive history of the culture wars over sex education but also an important examination of the politics of sexual speech in the United States. Exploring the clash between professional sex education advocates on the one hand and the politicized Christian Right on the other, Irvine vividly demonstrates the crucial role that sexual speech plays in cultural politics. Examining a range of issues played out in living rooms and schools since the 1960s, she shows how a newly emerging Christian Right chose sex education as one of its first battlegrounds, then went on to dominate the public conversation on the subject. Talk about Sex is a rich and fascinating consideration of American sex education's strategic place in the long history of efforts to regulate sexual morality by controlling sexual speech.
Irvine's original argument shows how sex education served as a bridge issue between the Old Right and the New Right. Exploring the political uses of emotion as it relates to sexuality, Irvine demonstrates how this movement draws on the tenacious power of sexual shame and fear in order to galvanize opposition to sex education. This book skillfully demonstrates how―by framing sex education as radical, dangerous, and immoral―the Right has fostered a climate in which it is risky, as former Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders found, to speak out in support of sexuality education.
An important book analyzing the Right’s opposition to K-12 comprehensive sex education beginning in the 1970s and the ways in which their battle enhanced their larger political movement. Opposition to sex education was part of an overall resistance to generational change in the postwar period, reflecting a desire to lock in traditional gender roles and preserve a Romantic notion of the innocence of childhood. But in order to make their argument, the Right’s rhetoric relied on more sexually explicit language even than proponents of sexuality education; conservatives put forward detailed accusations of teachers who recruited kids to homosexuality and assorted perversions, and even offered explicit classroom demonstrations. (Irvine shows how conservatives unconscionably lied about what was happening in classrooms, thanks to supposedly biblically endorsed “mental reservations” that were akin to fingers crossed behind one’s back.) This rhetoric advanced a sexualized culture without arming children with the knowledge necessary to make sense of it, and not incidentally resulted in a cottage industry of new political organizations and abstinence-only curricula and other products. The Right had successfully quashed sex talk in the classroom by the early 2000s, but Irvine suggests that curiosity and the thirst for necessary knowledge cannot be permanently denied.
Some parts repeat themselves, describing in different words over and over how the Christian Right has managed to stop the implementation of comprehensive sex education by inspiring fear in their own group and others who were impartial. I learned how the Kendrick v. Heckler case caused religious words to not be used in schools, presidents and what they did to make it worse, and about AFLA (the act that promoted abstinence-only sex ed, 1981) and SIECUS (nonprofit that advances sex ed, founded in1964).
Fantastic look at politics and culture in sexuality education! Similar to Teaching Sex: The Shaping of Adolescence in the 20th Century but with a much more clearly defined stance on the issue. Written a little less like a cultural anthropologist and more like an advocate of sexuality education.
"No nonsense and exhaustively well-researched/documented. No stone left unturned in this history. Helps the reader understand the tacitcs used my nutty christian fundamentalists to shutdown open (and NEEDED) dialogue about sexuality in this country. "