This book had a winning plot, that kept me reading despite the poor character development and non existent transitions and typos. It seemed like a first draft, hastily thrown together, yet with some work, there could be potential.
For example the main character is beaten mercilessly by her husband and has lifelong scars, she is frightened beyond belief and just one day she decides to stand up to him. We don't get to see her thought process, How or where she finally finds the courage to stand up to a man who will kill her with only the slightest provocation. Suddenly, she is willing to stand up and defend anyone that crosses her path. It is not believable. The protagonist and antagonist and both flat, one being all good to oppose the other, all evil.
Likewise, the transitions are so poorly written they left me confused, so much so that I had to go back and reread bits again to see if I had missed something. I lost count of how many times I had to do this, I finally got so annoyed that I stopped reading about two thirds through the book.
I feel like this has such potential, if an editor could have pointed out that better transitions were needed to make things clear for the reader, and the main characters needed to be more developed to be believed. The editor could have asked these questions of the writer; how does a girl with a good upbringing and self worth get beaten down so much? Yes that does happen all too often, but we all want to know the process, How does that happen? Usually very slowly overtime, her self worth is eroded. Similarly the editor could have asked how did her husband become so evil? Why do people still trust him? There is interesting material there just waiting to be written. Lastly, where/how does she find the courage to finally stand up for herself? That is the meat of the story that is missing.