"From the earliest times a message has passed from the East to the West." This vivid and poetic work links teachers from he Western Mystery Tradition to a common Eastern source. Great individuals like Apollonius of Tyana, Christian Rosenkreutz, Hugues des Payans, Nicolas Flamel, Saint-Germain the Immortal, and Madam Blavatsky are seen as "heroic messengers" drawing from the same "bountiful river." At times they have profoundly influenced the course of history, often passing from land to land leaving behind them followers who have preserved the secrets of their masters. Thus the teachings of the Neo-Pythagoreans, Cathars, Rosicrucians, Templars, alchemists and theosophists, all owe their existence to "the eternal truth of Brahma, which is as old as the appearance of man on earth."
Maurice Magre (March 2nd 1877 with Toulouse - December 11th 1941 in Nice) was a poet, a writer and a playwright French. He was a burning defender of Occitanie, and largely contributed to make known the martyr of Cathares of XIIIe century. With regard to his historical novels on the catharism, Maurice Magre fits especially in the line of the historian Napoleon Peyrat, in the direction where the author often prefers the legends and the romantic epopee with historical truth.
He composed his first poems at the 14 years age. Its first collections of worms were published in 1895. From 1898, it makes publish in Paris successively four collections of poetries.
During the first part of its life, it carried out a bohemian life and of vice and became even opium addict. It tried out all the pleasures, sought all the extases. In spite of a sulfurous reputation, he became however a famous and appreciated author. At the time of the publication of one of its books in 1924, the written Barber: “Magre is an anarchist, an individualist, a sadist, an opium addict. It has all the defects, it is a very great writer. Its work should be read. ”
In the second part of its life, it is interested in the esotericism and carries out a spiritual search, but does not cease therefore publishing many works as the list testifies some to these works (cf will infra).
In 1919, he discovered the Secret Doctrines , the major work of Mrs. Blavatsky, the Co-founder of the theosophic Société.
In 1935, although it was sick, it undertook a voyage towards the Indies in order to meet Sri Aurobindo in its Ashram de Pondichéry.
It founded on July 26th, 1937, with Francis Rolt-Wheeler, the “Company of the Friends of Montségur and the Holy Grail”.
The occult classic, allegedly, in which the highly pro-Cathar French theosophist Maurice Magre, writing in the 1930s, gives a whistle stop tour of the occult highlight reel, focusing on Christian Rosenkreutz, Nicholas Flamel and the book of Abraham, the Cathars, the Templars, et al et seq. There are sages in remote Himalayan mountains and beautiful women in white dresses. Mild but persistent misogyny throughout and he doesn't half bang on about rape.
Obviously this stuff is all made up anyway, but this book is significantly more made up than that, including but not limited to completely fictional people, conversations, events, motivations, assertions, and religious movements. "We don't know how the Buddhist faith could have spread to Languedoc in the eleventh century" he says, which in one sense is entirely correct in that we do not know how this thing that didn't happen did not happen, but in another and significantly more accurate sense is gibbering bullshit. The author's favourite phrase is "no doubt", as deployed in sentences like "We don't know what happened to Nicholas Flamel's nephew but no doubt he discovered the secrets of the Philosopher's Stone and became a sage" or "No doubt the last Cathars' bodies are forever preserved in a hidden cave still clutching their book of secrets" or "No doubt he went to a Himalayan monastery and discovered the wisdom of the ancients." I mean, yes, those are all the likeliest outcomes.
I was not expecting this to be a reliable or factual history, obv. It's published in Dennis Wheatley's Occult Library. But honestly, this is an utterly amazing illustration of what people will swallow, especially on the Cathars. Reminds me vaguely of GK Chesterton's aphorism about how "the nineteenth century decided to have no religious authority. The twentieth century seems disposed to have any religious authority."
This is a wonderful overview of mysterious movements and individuals throughout the ages. Magre the Magi starts things off shortly after Christ's time, in a chapter about Appolonius of Tyana; but the rest of the book takes place within the past millenium, covering the movements of the Cathars, the Templars, the Rosicrucians; and the figures of Nicolas Flamel, the Count of St. Germain and Helena Blavatsky. Magre makes up a lot of stuff, but he admits when he's doing it and is very good at it. At times the writing is fluffy, and the different sections don't always feel connected, but the writing is unusually poetic for a theosophical book. It reignited my fascination with St. Germain, and sparked an interest in several of the other topics.
I have to admit, though, I've been trying with Appolonius for a while, and I just find him boring. Too perfect, maybe. So, consider skipping the first chapter. I actually started near the end, with St. Germain.
The 2nd chapter on the Cathars (or Albigenses) is phenomenal. Definitely the best in the book. No surprise, as the author was born and raised in the heart of Cathar country.
Interesting glimpse into the lives of esoteric leaders who haven't received much recognition in the 21st century. Saint-Germain and Madame Blavatsky were particularly interesting personalities to me. The book really drives home how society (in whatever age you live) will reject and punish any new and foreign line of thinking. Nice read!
A lot of necessary name drops for anyone looking into occult/mysticism/esoteric philosophy. Super dry so I was only able to tolerate reading the sections where I was somewhat familiar with the themes or names. I would suggest it to someone interested in the subject matter but not to anyone unfamiliar or uninterested in the mysteries.
Interesting, but not in a “oh this is legit” type way but in a “what sort of non factual cow dung is he gonna spew this chapter?!” Pro tip if it’s written by an early/mid 20th century white male and it pertains to religion? Or theology in any context? It’s going to be non factual bullshit to put it indelicately.
As someone with little to no knowledge of the subject, I thought this book was a pretty good introduction. The author is far from objective, but this keeps the book from getting stuffy. He does contradict himself a lot though, especially in the chapter on the Knights Templar.