A novel like an enchanting train ride that takes us deep into Russian history and national identity through the story of one exceptional family, passing through the graveyards of the past and upending a few bones in the process. The Goose Fritz comes on strong as a lyrical confrontation with a sometimes sinister, always fascinating, history.
This revelatory novel shows why Karl Ove Knausgaard has likened its celebrated Russian author to an "indomitable ... animal that won't let go of something when it gets its teeth into it." The book tells the story of a young Russian named Kirill, the sole survivor of a once numerous clan of German origin, who delves relentlessly into the unresolved past. His ancestor, Balthasar Schwerdt, son of a prominent surgeon, migrated to the Russian Empire in the 1830s, where he practiced alternative medicine, landing in the court of Catherine the Great. Schwerdt became captive to an erratic nobleman who supplied midgets, hunchbacks from Africa, and magicians to entertain the empress. Kirill’s investigation takes us through centuries of turmoil during which none of the German’s nine children or their descendants can escape their adoptive country’s cruel fate. Intent on uncovering buried mysteries, Kirill searches archives and cemeteries across Europe, while pressing witnesses for keys to understanding. The Goose Fritz illuminates both personal and political history in a passion-filled family saga about an often confounding country that has long fascinated the world. (less)
Review:
I never heard of Sergei Lebedev before ( for obvious reasons I become quite ignorant of the Russian literature of the last two decades - trying to make myself *less* ignorant of English and American literature took most of my free time :)), when I read the review in WSj I decided to give this one a try. It is a book that resonated with me deeply, however for a while I was not sure if that was because author and myself are more or less of the same generation and were born in the same part of the world, so what he would write was bound to reso0nate. However now when I am done I am pretty sure that in large part it was because the author possesses superb writing skill. I could not stop reading this book and while this is not the first book I could not stop reading in my life, it is one of the few ( and off the top of my head I really cannot remember that many ) where the "show not tell" maxim is really not applicable in my opinion.
Our narrator Kirill a historian who learned about his German ancestry from his grandmother is writing a book about his family and most of the characters we see through his eyes, he tells us his stories. He learns the stories from his research - both from reading books and talking to people. Some of the events of the past though he imagines, sort of connects the dots that he learns and supposedly he has a gift of imagining the past correctly. My point is that all that Kirill does is tells us, tells us, tells us and as I said, I was so engrossed in his telling. Bravo author, because as I said I rarely like a book written this way.
Of course through researching/ imagining his ancestors' stories, the good and bad, joys and pain (so much pain) they went through in the country who should have treated them far less cruelly Kirill learns more about himself, but I am pretty sure I cared far more about people whose lives he shared with us than about him. I am sure it was by design .
Themes of this book as I interpreted them were both uniquely Russian and sadly universal. Let's treat Russians of German identity horribly during the wars with Germany because *of course* they would betray Russia and start serving Germany. Of course :(. Revolutions, wars, Stalinism - Kirill's family went through all of this and almost nobody survived.
Accidentally this book has a couple of the most memorable descriptions of the soldiers with PTSD.
"“Firebrands,” whispered the colonel. “They were like firebrands. Then, at New Year’s. I can’t stand the sight of fire since then. I can’t eat shashlik, I instantly see that. But, but ... once a year... I go far away. Alone. To the village where I was born. There’s no village anymore, just three houses. I have a field there. When we were children we had a bonfire there when we pastured the horses. At the riverbank. A pure, good river. So there ... I gather branches. And have a fire. Just a fire. Alone under the sky. And I think I feel better.”
The colonel stopped talking, staring into the mouth of the Eternal Flame. Kirill felt a cast-iron exhaustion; but through it came a vague image suggested by the colonel’s words. The tanks moved on into the blizzard, as if they had never been there. The snow covered their tracks, and Kirill realized that this had been a rehearsal of the annual parade celebrating the end of the battle; the colonel had been remembering his winter storming of Grozny, his first battle, in the winter of 1994–1995, when the Chechen grenade throwers burned the tank columns that entered the city without cover."
I will leave you to discover the meaning of the title on your own.
I am still thinking about the ending. I think it is supposed to be good thing for Kirill, but who knows.