I've been delving into the history of the ancient Near East for some time now, an area that is sometimes referred to as the cradle of civilization. From a chronological point of view that is more or less correct: it was in Mesopotamia and Egypt that the first more complex states of humanity came into existence. But that doesn't mean at all that civilization was "invented" there and then spread to the rest of the world. And, of course, you can question whether state formation can be regarded as the only form or criterion of civilization.
Anyway, I have learned a lot from this almost exhaustive yet very didactic work (unfortunately only available in French). It is limited to Mesopotamia and the surrounding area, and largely follows a chronological line, starting with the Uruk culture (c. 4,000 BCE) and ending with the occupation of Mesopotamia by the Sassanides (c. 120 BCE). But some short contributions at the end of the book deal with interesting methodological and thematic issues. I would like to have seen more of the latter, to be honest. Another small point of criticism is that this book mainly focuses on the political-military evolution of the area, and much less attention is paid to socio-economic, cultural and ordinary daily life. But despite these shortcomings, this still is an impressive book, also because of its balanced and careful approach: it is constantly indicating how the scientific view of certain phenomena is shifting, and on which topics there still is debate. This is science the way I like it: transparent, almost complete, balanced and emphasizing the strengths and weaknesses of certain views, or the lack of sources.
To end, just a brief consideration of what struck me the most and was relatively new to me. If you plow through this thick book, you will notice how dynamic and changing the successive peoples and cultures in Mesopotamia were, and at the same time how they managed to keep a very high degree of continuity spread over thousands of years. Until now I thought that only the Egyptian Nile Valley was characterized by such manifest homogeneity over such a long period of time. But that is equally the case with Mesopotamia, despite the fact that the area was almost continuously taken over by new, often (semi)-nomadic peoples. This book emphasizes how gradual these processes of migration and acculturation were, and thus how other peoples apparently easily adapted to the existing culture while also adding their own accent to it. In that regard, it is a pity that this book has not yet incorporated the recent insights of the Ancient DNA revolution. I suspect that the results of this research will not be fully integrated until the next decade, and I should not be surprised that they will highlight the complex demographic and cultural dynamics of Mesopotamia even more than before. Seeing how the historical science keeps on evolving truly makes me happy. It’s a rare ray of light in these gloomy times.