What do you think?
Rate this book


323 pages, Hardcover
First published August 13, 2019
""Dedicated to Lucifer", [Alinsky's Rules for Radicals published in 1971] "the book championed ammorality. The electorate were sheep Alinsky believed, to be herded, lied to, and manipulated so that the radical few could "change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be". . . . The book was a crackpot vision of mankind and civilization, . . . right down there in the sewer with Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler, whose tactics for taking over a democratic state Alinsky had used as for model. Although Alinsky made his bows to the values of democracy, he urged political action by whatever means necessary to achieve the radicals' goals. The question, he said, was always, "Does this particular end justify this particular means?" That was the question he put to the person trying to decide if he was justified in lying, manipulating, cheating, and slandering to get what he and his fellow believers wanted. Of course, the answer was and is always yes. Yes, yes, yes. Folks. let's welcome Lenin, Hitler, Stalin, Chairman Mao, and Fidel Castro to the stage.
Lucifer . . . Satan. The Devil."
""The world as it should be. . ." That Alinsky phrase sounded benign enough, until one realizes that Alinsky advocated amoral means to get there: lying, cheating, election fraud and character assassination, all of which were the antithesis of the underlying philosophy of democratic, representative government."
". . . the world that Alinsky and his disciples envisioned, the world as it should be, was a socialist dictatorship that jettisoned the right of the governed to choose their rulers The ruled were to be manipulated by radical visionaries for their own benefit. This prescription had been used with catastrophic effect by revolutionaries during the 20th century. Alinsky merely defined their methods. In effect, he updated Machiavelli's 16th century advice to the prince. And, appropriately enough, dedicated his efforts to the Devil."It appear many reviews are based on the political biases of the reviewers. That's too bad, because underneath the obvious is the less obvious. Like Tom Clancy, Stephen Coonts is scarily prescient about the state of the world and brutally honest about the world as it is.
". . . Fanatics know to an absolute certainty that their view of the world is correct and that their enemies are not merely misguided, but evil. One must fight the devil with any tools at hand. Any tactics are justified. Unfortunately, today, the political scene in America has radicalized many on both the left and right who had never read or even heard of Saul Alinksy. How can one who knows the truth in the depths of his soul compromise with evil?"
"It came, I suspect from the Kremlin. The political conditions in Europe and America are ripe. The liberals and conservatives hate each other; each considers the other subhuman. They are ready for war to death. Given weapons, they will destroy each other. It is in Russia's best interest that they do."Sadly, truer words haven't been written.