So I typically come away from both sutras and also this book just thinking Buddhism is weird. I do wonder if this is a personal limitation exacerbated by the unfamiliarity of Eastern symbolism.
I did like the practical nature of this book. As someone who practices mindfulness daily, I appreciated the number of different exercises and variants of how to approach practicing with Dakinis. It was also fascinating to learn about female symbolism within Tantric Buddhism.
There were a number of things I did not resonate with. I could have done without the whole first portion that talked about Allione’s journey into Buddhism and struggles finding her specific spiritual path. Plus quoting yourself and your other books as liberally as Allione does seems like cheating. At the same time, I wondered if I had missed out by not reading Allione’s previous books. I was interested in where these Dakini images came from. Allione never mentions the similarity in the portrayal of the Dakinis to images of Kali. Without some recognition and comparison it’s hard to buy that all of the destructive facets of the Dakinis really refer to cutting away of delusion and brining about enlightenment. I mean, they’re standing on a dead body after all.
Allione also states explicitly near the start that the Dakinis aren’t meant to seem like enneagrams, but they do. Really, certain people are supposed to be represented not only by certain qualities, but by specific body types and preferences for things like big jewelry? We seem to be entering horoscope territory. Ok, and yes, I can see that we all contain aspects of these different qualities, but to categorize these things together and then present it without any apparent scrutiny or placement in a societal or historical context left me wanting something different.
Altogether a nice collection of meditations, some of which I will come back to, but not really satisfying my itch for a feminist approach to Buddhism.